A variety of JMP mixture designs options support experimental situations where properties of a blend of components depend more on the relative proportions than on the absolute amounts being mixed. See how to create, analyze and interpret the results of several types of mixture designs.
See how to:
Questions answered by Tom Donnelly @tom_donnelly and Scott Allen @scott_allen at the 2024 live webinar:
Q: How do you decide the direction of the inequality sign when building linear constraints?
A: You need to think about it or write it out algebraically. From a point of view of the Ternary Plot, the blue triangle and the green triangle get defined by that inequality. And then that starts the algebra. See video below.
Q: How would you incorporate continuous factors, like curing or drying times, into mixtures.
A: That requires custom design. The example shows you all the steps. It has the 6 mixture components, but then it also has a cure time and an associated temperature. See the 10-factor example (JMP Complex multi-factor custom design.pdf).
Q: What is the difference between selecting None vs Specify for Define Factor Constraints?
A: None will mean that there are no specified constraints. If you would like to Define the Constraint you can select Specify to define the constraints.
Q: How did you zoom in on the Ternary Plots?
A: It is a few small steps. Remember if you rerun the Prediction Profiler after you zoom in, the Ternary Plot will refresh and you will lose the zoomed area, of course. See video below.
Q: If I don't want to specify linear constraints, would this affect my final analysis?
A: You don't have to have to have constraints to do a mixture design. We're just illustrating it, because more often than not, that knowledge of the chemistry comes into place is sort of very early on.
Q: If you're changing one mixture term and it affects the others and VIFs are unreasonably high, how do you get around the model being biased from that collinearity or multicollinearity.
A: I generally live with it. I think you'll find that the VIFs with mixtures can be all over the place. And there may be a lot of correlation. Particularly when you start getting into relatively trace components and mixtures, you have very thin regions. I am less worried about trying to interpret coefficients with a mixture than I am trying to interpret what are the predictions doing in this hyper triangular space.
Resources:
Great presentation ... Thanks! ... A couple of thoughts come to mind ...
First, relating to "why DOE", I like to say that DOE tells you what happens when you turn more than one dial at the same time.
About the question on VIF's ... The coefficients in mixture models do not represent factor effects as they do in traditional DOE. In mixture designs the effects are given by traces (profiles) of predicted model values (which are not impacted by VIF) over the constrained mixture region. Indeed, effects of traditional DOE can also be shown be traces of predicted values (instead of model coefficients) which is what the prediction profile is. Hope this helps.