JMP Wish List

What inspired this wish list request?  I am analyzing data for an engineer in which part of the data is below the detection limit, which is good. I want to include that data in the results. The data is a batch process, and the batch should be included in the model as a random term.   I tried using GenReg (which accepts interval censored data), but it would not allow the random term in the model. I tried using Standard Least Squares, but it would not acknowledge the interval censored data. I tried using Generalized Linear Mixed Model, but it would not acknowledge the interval censored data.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  I would like a modeling platform that allows random terms in the model, and interval censored responses.   Why is this idea important?  This would allow me to build models for my engineers that do not have glaring problems or missing data.   ... View more

As a JMP Partner in Brazil, I teach people how to use JMP to solve problems using data, and I’ve received some feedback on the language options available within JMP. While multiple languages are supported, Portuguese is not yet one of them. Including Portuguese would be a significant step toward expanding the JMP community in Latin America. Brazil is a huge market with tremendous potential! Although there are thousands of JMP users here, not all are fluent in English or Spanish. Our competitors’ software includes Portuguese support, which often makes it the preferred choice for some users. Adding a Portuguese option would greatly benefit the JMP community and increase adoption across Brazil. Thanks! ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?    When evaluating the ratio of two data sets, for example, product 1 and product 2, the most well accepted method for determining the confidence interval of this ration is Fieller's method/theorem. This analysis is currently not available in JMP and R must be used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieller%27s_theorem       What is the improvement you would like to see?  I would like to see an option in the Oneway analysis fit y by x platform to perform this analysis.   Why is this idea important?  This is needed when making comparisons between two things expressed as a ratio, for example, product 1 is X% better than product 2.    ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? The right-click bootstrap feature is not currently available in reports that use by-group processing. If one wants to run bootstraps on multiple subsets of data, rows in the data table must be manually included/excluded and run as separate distributions.   What is the improvement you would like to see? The right-click bootstrap feature becoming available in reports that use by-group processing would be a major time saver and help reduce manual filtering errors when subsetting the data for each group's bootstrap.     Why is this idea important?  Bootstrapping is a tool my colleagues and I use regularly while writing reports. It would save a lot of rework and, again, truly reduce manual filtering errors when subsetting the data for each group's bootstrap.     ... View more

Hello, I am a physician researcher. In biology and clinical measurements, many times it is difficult to analyze data numerically because of patient heterogeneity, no real baseline, etc. What we do have is trends, i.e. "where is this (value) going". Biologically, many times the changes, trends and trajectories are more important than absolute values, or just more reliable. Therefore when I'm following up patients or results from biological samples, it is not uncommon for me to need to see what is the trend over time of a group of patients or samples. Then I want to compare them, cluster them, etc. There are some techniques to do that, very well reviewed and exemplified here: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad390 Another important aspect of this (local similarity analysis) is the ability to synchronize signals as they evolve over time.   Having these features in JMP would be invaluable!   Uriel. ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  What is the improvement you would like to see?   It is standard 95% two-sided and often a 95% one sided makes more sense. But in general we should be able to change it.   ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? I have found functional data explorer to be useful for modeling kinetics. It would be really nice if I could share the prediction profiler with a wider audience.   What is the improvement you would like to see? I would like to see the ability to view profilers for platforms like Functional Data Explorer available in JMP Live.   Why is this idea important? It would allow me to show more advanced modeling prediction profilers. These are useful for dialing in recipes with margin differences.     ... View more

Thanks to Russ Wolfinger and JMP Super-Users like @SDF1, there are now add-ins that allow easy tuning of hyperparameters for XGBoost, neural nets, bootstrap forests, and others, but I would really like to see these integrated into JMP. One thing I would like to do is test out thousands of neural networks with multiple Y's, which cannot yet be done with the add-in (and is not possible at all for XGBoost, as far as I can tell).      Sometimes, we need to predict more than one thing. For instance, maybe you want to optimize a process while minimizing costs. With several JMP modeling platforms, you can create a two-Y model, then use the desirability analysis under the profiler to do this, but you cannot build thousands of dual-Y models using neural networks, bootstrap forests, or even standard least squares. I think this would really increase the capacity of JMP Pro to do some hardcore predictive modeling.      ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? The result the LCA platform changes every time you run it because you cannot set a random seed. When sharing the results with business stakeholders this problematic because the reported result differs from the demonstrated result. Having to explain why to the results differ adds complexity to what can already be a difficult conversation.   What is the improvement you would like to see? Add the ability to set a random sed to the LCA platform.   Why is this idea important? No need to explain why the reported results differ from the demonstrated results to business stakeholders. Different results, while expandable, can erode confidence in the results, especially for the stakeholders who are less familiar with statistics.     ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  Trying to make slight modifications to my existing models when I just have formula columns seems to take quite a bit of effort unless I have the script every time saved.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  In most simple case I would be happy to just have a way of getting all the column names used in a formula on clipboard (also make this scriptable without clipboard...). There might be other wish list item for this item but I could quickly find one. There are solutions in the community for this but they are fairly complicated Head Arg Recurse Formula , How to automatically extract the column name used by the formula in the JSL code? .   In best case I would like to be able to re-launch the platform which did create my prediction columns. As I'm JMP Pro user, I would be fine having this as a feature in Formula Depot. In this case it would be nice if different settings would be also pre-filled IF they are stored to the column properties.   Why is this idea important?  Makes it easier to go from prediction formula back to the launcher (when possible) to make small modifications if needed or just to rerun the model with same settings without having to save the platform script every time.   ... View more

  ☑ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☑ users can remove bugs on their on ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it   What inspired this wish list request?  Via  a user can edit the main menu and [on windows systems] the toolbars.   Other menus cannot be edited. Unfortunately, some of the implemented functions have bugs - and some functions are missing.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  Please add the possibility to remove items from any right click /  red triangle / ...  menu and the possibility to add user defined items. This will allow us to fix tiny issues which won't make it into a future version of JMP - or just in many years. e.g. - Allow us to perform more actions when right clicking on column name on columns panel  - Paste Column has a bug and should be replaced with a version without bug: JMP jumps   Is it possible to customize the Add Formula Column menu to include customize functions?    yes and no: -  a user can not add  user-Defined mini GUIs , e.g. to add Modulo to the portfolio. - Existing functions cannot be added to the menu by name.   (TS-00152405)     Why is this idea important?  Less pressure on JMP developers to bugfix and fine-tune the GUI. Users don't have to wait for version N+2. -> Users will be able to bugfix and tweak the GUI on their own.   other wishes from  ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? There is only one test available in the platform response screening: seems to be ANOVA that gives the pvalue testing the effect of X on response Y.   What is the improvement you would like to see ? It should be great to have non-parametrical test such as Wilcoxon test or other, or the choice of the test to be done in order to get the advantages of controlling the false-discovery rate when multiple tests.   Why is this idea important ? It's important to improve the statistical theory behind "Pvalue" output of this platform which do not give any information on the test done, that seems not adpated to different distibutions of X or Y.     ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? Please describe the current issue that needs improvement or the problem to be solved that is not easy or possible right now, with an example use case. The variable importance analysis employs a Monte Carlo simulation, therefore each time you perform a specific analysis the importance report changes somewhat, and the results are therefore not exactly reproducible.  One can manually add a random seed command to the Profiler script to make the importance report reproducible in the future. However, it would be nice to be able to set a random seed while performing the analysess.     What is the improvement you would like to see? Please describe the idea for improving JMP. Please include mock-ups, wireframes, screenshots, scripts, other documents or examples from other software that help describe the change you would like to see.  Exact reproducibility of variable importance results   Why is this idea important? Please describe the value to you and/or other users if the idea is implemented (for example, ease of use, must have,…). When scientists observe that the variable importance reports are not exactly the same each time the analysis is performed, they tend to become skeptical of the approach.  Also, these variable importance reports are sometimes used as supporting documentation for critical process parameter identification in FDA filings, so it is important they be exactly reproducible.   ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? Please describe the current issue that needs improvement or the problem to be solved that is not easy or possible right now, with an example use case.  Semiconductor industry need the virtal metrology but less researchers and manager have not understand the importance of virtual metrology. Thus I woyld like to requset JMP to have script to run virtual-metrology.     What is the improvement you would like to see? Please describe the idea for improving JMP. Please include mock-ups, wireframes, screenshots, scripts, other documents or examples from other software that help describe the change you would like to see.  Yield analysis engineer and process engineer use JUMP to improve yiled and improve the controllability of process tool based on JUMP.     Why is this idea important? Please describe the value to you and/or other users if the idea is implemented (for example, ease of use, must have,…).vast impact on semiconductor industory to lower the cost of the product by improving yield.     ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  Making small mistakes when launching JMP Platforms and I already have implemented this to my platforms.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  I would like to see "Keep dialog open" checkbox in all of the JMP platforms which have a launcher and close it when you press "OK". Other option would be to provide some sort of "Preview" for the platforms but this would be much more complicated to implement to not slow down platforms too much.     Why is this idea important?  Making very small mistake in JMP launcher forces you to find the launcher from menus again and pressing Recall or you can use View/Recall Last Platform (hidden inside menus and has very bad shortcut by default as it forces you to remove your hand from mouse). ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  Unlike other statistical software (Minitab), it seems that JMP doesn't provide detailed formulas for analyses. This lack of details and transparency can make it difficult for users to understand the underlying calculations.     What is the improvement you would like to see?  Provide more formulas for analyses where it makes sense to include them in the support documentation and in cases where formulas are quite complex, simplified formulas for simplified examples so the user can understand the concept.   Why is this idea important?  understand the underlying calculations, it is quite often to get request to explain the analysis, how do you derive this conclusion and what kind of analysis and fundamental concept formulas are being used in the analysis.   ... View more

Hello, I know there has been similar posts and requests on this topic, sorry about that. Some applications (e.g. in spectroscopy analysis) require doing signal deconvolution using a simple combination of multiple gaussians (see capture attached). I have seen alternatives suggested here (by using the distribution plateform, or with PLS). Does it mean that the multiple gaussians fit method will never be implemeted in JMP (or in a custom add-in)? Thanks Best Regards    ... View more

☐ cool new feature ☑ could help all Jmp users! ☑ removes something that feels like a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it   What inspired this wish list request?  In Jmp18, a warning message appears for EVERY user - EVERY day - EVERY time Jmp is started  ... unfortunately: already months before Jmp expires. Unlike a splash window, the pop-up window remains in place until the user closes it manually.   This is how it looks like:   What is the improvement you would like to see?  Please - remove the warning message [either: completely, or: after 3 seconds] - just show the warning message 1 - 2 x before it gets disabled [automatically] or: - add an option to disable the warning message (like for the startup splash window).   Why is this idea important?  less confusion for JMP users no annoyed license site managers   other wishes from    TS-00143027   ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  (1) From 'Functional DOE Profiler' feacture in Functional Data Explorer in JMP Pro, I would like to see   (1-1) Confidence Intervals   and   (1-2) Interactive HTML file export from the profiler   (2) From 'Model Comparison' in JMP Pro,    (2-1) 'Model Averaging' (Ensemble) result showed a fixed RSquare (1.00) and RASE (0.00). I think it's a bug.     (2-2) Shelf made 'Ensemble model' that is formulated from other models (Least Squares, Partial Least Squares, SVEM Lasso, XGBoost, Neural Turned with different weight) also showed a fixed RSquare (1.00) and RASE (0.00) value in Model Comparison results.    What is the improvement you would like to see? Why is this idea important?      ... View more