cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP Security Notice: CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619

    JMP promptly initiated a review of its products, services, and relevant infrastructure for exposure to CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619.

    Our assessment of JMP products has not identified exposure to these vulnerabilities. Where remediation was required within supporting environments, appropriate security updates and controls have been applied and validated.

    We have identified no evidence of successful exploitation or unauthorized access to JMP systems or customer information associated with these vulnerabilities.

    JMP continues to monitor the issue and relevant vendor guidance. No action is required by JMP customers at this time.

  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Graph Builder Toolbar streamlines interactive graphing. Creates shortcuts on Report and GraphBuilder Helpers toolbars. Download and install the extension.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Extrapolation Control in Profiler with multiple models

What inspired this wish list request? Very often I had models for multiple responses from the same data set.  Recently, I had a few from plant data that were not from a DOE and used the extrapolation control to make sure we weren’t going too far astray.  However, when using the Profiler in the Fit Group, I couldn’t use Extrapolation Control because each response had a different model (and sometimes different missing data in the Y’s).  I could put the Extrapolation control on each model, link my profilers, and scroll up and down the Fit Group page to see if I am extrapolating in each model, but this is frustrating!  

 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see? It would be great to be able to see a table of the extrapolation details in the Profiler when we have multiple models with different terms.  A JSL example for JMP Technical Support case 00283664 gives an example with the table below the Profiler, but it would be nice to see in its usual place above the Profiler.

 

 

Why is this idea important?   The extrapolation control is important for obvious reasons, but not being able to see it easily for multiple models is frustrating, especially when you have multiple acceptable solutions and want to know which are model extrapolations and by how much.

 

 

1 Comment
SarahGilyard
Staff
Status changed to: Acknowledged

We are reviewing this request along with this related submission: https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/Output-random-table-from-Profiler-with-extrapolation-deta...

Thank you for posting.