cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP software.

  1. Search: Please search for an existing idea first before submitting a new idea.
  2. Submit: Post your new idea using the Suggest an Idea button. Please submit one actionable idea per post rather than a single post with multiple ideas.
  3. Kudo & Comment Kudo ideas you like, and comment to add to an idea.
  4. Subscribe: Follow the status of ideas you like. Refer to status definitions to understand where an idea is in its lifecycle. (You are automatically subscribed to ideas you've submitted or commented on.)

We consider several factors when looking for what ideas to add to JMP. This includes what will have the greatest benefit to our customers based on scope, needs and current resources. Product ideas help us decide what features to work on next. Additionally, we often look to ideas for inspiration on how to add value to developments already in our pipeline or enhancements to new or existing features.

Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

data tables: get non-excluded rows

☑ cool new feature
☑ could help many users!

☐ removes a „bug“

☐ nice to have

☐ nobody needs it

 

 

Please allow the user to send

 

 

 

 

 

 

dt << Get nonExcluded Rows();

 

 

 

 

 

 

to a data table to get a matrix of all row numbers of non-excluded rows. 
Please make the implementation as fast as

dt << Get Excluded Rows();

https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/col-lt-lt-get-values-for-non-excluded-rows/m-p/556579/highl... 

 

The fastes single-line command that was posted in the community is almost an order of magnitude slower:

 

 

 

 

 

 

allRows = dt << get rows where( Excluded() == 0 );

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/col-lt-lt-get-values-for-non-excluded-rows/m-p/564380/highl... 

 

And first asking for the non-excluded rows and then "inverting the list" adds 30-50% to the time budget.

https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/col-lt-lt-get-values-for-non-excluded-rows/m-p/564136/highl... 

 

more wishes submitted by  hogi_2-1702196401638.png

5 Comments
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Hi @hogi, thank you for your suggestion! We have captured your request and will take it under consideration.

mia_stephens
Staff
Status changed to: Investigating
 
mia_stephens
Staff
Status changed to: Yes, Stay Tuned!
 
hogi
Level XI

Post by  @Audrey_Shull in Discussions:

https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/col-lt-lt-get-values-for-non-excluded-rows/m-p/619448/highl... 

@Audrey_Shull wrote:

Thank you for the suggestions. JMP 18 will implement a new series of JSL functions that improves the performance and readability of the specific query discussed here and other similar queries. Documentation has been updated also to reflect the preferred/faster methods. 

The JSL looks something like this:

//instead of Get Rows Where()
Where( dt, Excluded() );
Where( dt, !Excluded() );
Where( dt, Hidden() );
Where( dt, !Hidden() );
Where( dt, Labeled() ); 
Where( dt, !Labeled() );
Where( dt, Is Missing() );

 

hogi
Level XI

@Sarah-Sylvestre , thanks for delivering