cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Learn how to build custom Python data connectors and further customize JMP’s Data Connector Framework with the Python Data Connector Demo, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • See how to create experiments to support product design and ID useful product features. Register for June 12 webinar, 2pm US Eastern Time.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Labeling Flexibility for Split-Plot and Random Block Experiments for Evaluate Design

When generating a split-plot or other experiment with random blocks using Custom Design, I really like how the resulting data table has an Evaluate Design script already attached to it. However, if I update the 'Whole Plots' or 'Random Block' to actually reflect what it truly means in practice (e.g. Setup or Batch) then the script doesn't work. I think it's as simple as adding that linkage (as denoted by the ":" that you get with the other factors).

 

If I just have X1-X3, this is what the code looks like for a split-plot, and won't update once the Whole Plots column is renamed. However, if I update the name of X1, it will update appropriately.

 

DOE( Evaluate Design, X( Whole Plots, :X1, :X2, :X3 ) )
3 Comments
Jeff_Perkinson
Community Manager

This looks like an oversight. I've recorded the request internally and we'll try to address in a maintenance release.

Jeff_Perkinson
Community Manager
Status changed to: Yes, Stay Tuned!

This will be addressed in the JMP 16.2 maintenance update.

Status changed to: Delivered