cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP software.

  1. Search: Please search for an existing idea first before submitting a new idea.
  2. Submit: Post your new idea using the Suggest an Idea button. Please submit one actionable idea per post rather than a single post with multiple ideas.
  3. Kudo & Comment Kudo ideas you like, and comment to add to an idea.
  4. Subscribe: Follow the status of ideas you like. Refer to status definitions to understand where an idea is in its lifecycle. (You are automatically subscribed to ideas you've submitted or commented on.)

We consider several factors when looking for what ideas to add to JMP. This includes what will have the greatest benefit to our customers based on scope, needs and current resources. Product ideas help us decide what features to work on next. Additionally, we often look to ideas for inspiration on how to add value to developments already in our pipeline or enhancements to new or existing features.

Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Change behaviour (or provide option) when using Find in filters to not remove filter before value is selected

Status: New Submitted by Super User on ‎03-15-2023 04:34 AM
1 Comment (1 New)

(This might be a bug or feature with Find in filters, no idea, so I will make wish list item)

 

What inspired this wish list request? 

Working with many unique values in large datasets which sometimes require me to use Find functionality of filters can make JMP fairly unresponsive depending on what type of report you are filtering

 

What is the improvement you would like to see? 

Provide a new option which would prevent from earlier filter being removed before value is selected. Below is an example how it currently behaves:

1. Starting situation with no Lot_Wafer Label's selected

jthi_0-1678868910430.png

 

2. Select one value to filter down the data (1_3)

jthi_1-1678868931168.png

 

3. Start typing value to Find to find what you are interested in (1_10), when I get to "1_1" earlier filter gets removed and all data will be visible and no filter selected. I think this is dependent on the values which are visible, for example if I were to search for "2_10" it would get unfiltered after typing "2" because the original value isn't in the list of values

jthi_2-1678868982063.png

 

4. How I would like it to behave is to keep the earlier selection (1_3) until I select new value(s) to filter by

jthi_3-1678869035621.png

 

Why is this idea important? 

Improves the user-experience when using data filters in JMP by making them feel more responsive.

1 Comment
hogi
Level XI
Wednesday
Wednesday

duplicate wish by @shampton82 :
Have data filter selections not clear when you need to enter a new filtering item