User Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Add 95% confidence intervals to MSA outputs

Status: New Submitted by on ‎01-09-2024 10:49 PM
Comment

What inspired this wish list request? In other stat packages I have used I can get 95% confidence intervals for various MSA outputs, such as % tolerance, StDev, 6xSD, and % Study Variation.

 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see?  I would like to see the option of showing 95% confidence intervals for the following outputs:

Both EMP and Variation Platforms: All possible output columns need CI's

shampton82_0-1704857577144.pngshampton82_0-1704857577144.png

Variation Platform: Variance and % of Total need CI's, EMP: % of total only as Var Component is there already. 

shampton82_1-1704857587136.pngshampton82_1-1704857587136.png

 

 

 

 

Why is this idea important? CI are important for MSA studies as they help an investigator know if there is enough data in the study to be a useful result.  I've seen people get a % tolerance of 25% and pat themselves on the back but the CI's are basically from 9% to 95% so you really have no confidence with the amount of data you collected.

 

JMP 17.2 Pro