cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-714472%22%20slang%3D%22de-DE%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EAggiungere%20intervalli%20di%20confidenza%20al%2095%25%20agli%20output%20MSA%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-714472%22%20slang%3D%22de-DE%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3ECosa%20ha%20ispirato%20questa%20richiesta%20di%20lista%20dei%20desideri%3F%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20In%20altri%20pacchetti%20statistici%20che%20ho%20utilizzato%20posso%20ottenere%20intervalli%20di%20confidenza%20del%2095%25%20per%20vari%20output%20MSA%2C%20come%25%20tolleranza%2C%20StDev%2C%206xSD%20e%25%20variazione%20studio.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EQual%20%C3%A8%20il%20miglioramento%20che%20vorresti%20vedere%3F%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Mi%20piacerebbe%20vedere%20l'opzione%20di%20mostrare%20intervalli%20di%20confidenza%20al%2095%25%20per%20i%20seguenti%20output%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESia%20piattaforme%20EMP%20che%20varianti%3A%20tutte%20le%20possibili%20colonne%20di%20output%20necessitano%20di%20elementi%20della%20configurazione%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1704857577144.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1704857577144.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F60236i25FD611B0ACB65DD%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22shampton82_0-1704857577144.png%22%20alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1704857577144.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPiattaforma%20di%20variazione%3A%20varianza%20e%25%20della%20necessit%C3%A0%20totale%20di%20CI%2C%20EMP%3A%25%20del%20totale%20solo%20poich%C3%A9%20il%20componente%20Var%20%C3%A8%20gi%C3%A0%20presente.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_1-1704857587136.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_1-1704857587136.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20370px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F60237iA783ED2AAAD93142%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22shampton82_1-1704857587136.png%22%20alt%3D%22shampton82_1-1704857587136.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EPerch%C3%A9%20questa%20idea%20%C3%A8%20importante%3F%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Gli%20IC%20sono%20importanti%20per%20gli%20studi%20MSA%20poich%C3%A9%20aiutano%20il%20ricercatore%20a%20sapere%20se%20nello%20studio%20sono%20presenti%20dati%20sufficienti%20per%20ottenere%20un%20risultato%20utile.%20Ho%20visto%20persone%20ottenere%20una%20tolleranza%25%20del%2025%25%20e%20darsi%20una%20pacca%20sulla%20spalla%2C%20ma%20gli%20IC%20vanno%20sostanzialmente%20dal%209%25%20al%2095%25%2C%20quindi%20non%20hai%20davvero%20fiducia%20nella%20quantit%C3%A0%20di%20dati%20raccolti.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJMP%2017.2%20Pro%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-714472%22%20slang%3D%22de-DE%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EIngegneria%20della%20qualit%C3%A0%20e%20dei%20processi%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Add 95% confidence intervals to MSA outputs

What inspired this wish list request? In other stat packages I have used I can get 95% confidence intervals for various MSA outputs, such as % tolerance, StDev, 6xSD, and % Study Variation.

 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see?  I would like to see the option of showing 95% confidence intervals for the following outputs:

Both EMP and Variation Platforms: All possible output columns need CI's

shampton82_0-1704857577144.png

Variation Platform: Variance and % of Total need CI's, EMP: % of total only as Var Component is there already. 

shampton82_1-1704857587136.png

 

 

 

 

Why is this idea important? CI are important for MSA studies as they help an investigator know if there is enough data in the study to be a useful result.  I've seen people get a % tolerance of 25% and pat themselves on the back but the CI's are basically from 9% to 95% so you really have no confidence with the amount of data you collected.

 

JMP 17.2 Pro