I noticed the summary function did not category the row correctly when the table is huge this week.
I have one column (e.g. col A) containing very long characters. I try to see how many unique rows per the content of col A. JMP did generate a summary table without any error messages. To my surprise, the sub-table per the summary table still contains some unique rows. Anyone knows why?
The discrepancy I observed seems like that the criteria used to define matching row by Table summary function is different from that used by selecting matching rows. is this true? If yes, please elaborate the difference.