When a data filter is configured to be conditional, selections in one filter affect the values which are displayed in other filters:
When the user opens the red triangle menu and clicks on clear selection, the filter is reset and the other filters are adjusted accordingly.
Surprising:
When the user opens the red triangle menu and clicks on invert selection, the selection is just inverted, but none of the other filters is updated.
Is this behavior just on my system?
Not just because of this behavior ...
I added a wish to invert data filters - I mean: not invert the selection, but the action of the filter:
instead of including the selected items, the selected items will be excluded.
https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/data-filters-new-option-quot-not-quot/idc-p/582424
I admit, it's not comparable with the switch from black & white TV to color TV - but it will be fun to have this option
Names Default to Here(1);
dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class.jmp" );
Current Data Table() << Data Filter(
Location( {751, 160} ),
Conditional,
Mode( Select( 0 ), Include( 1 ) ),
Add Filter(
columns( :sex, :age, :name ),
Where( :sex == "F" ),
Where( :age == 16 ),
Display( :age, N Items( 6 ) ),
Display( :name, N Items( 15 ), "List Display", Find( Set Text( "" ) ) )
)
);
// now go to "age"(red triangle menu) and invert the selection
A simple workaround for this bug could be:
Change the modeling type to Multiple Response and use "match none".
Unfortunately, Jmp says that Multiple Response columns cannot be conditional.
Couldn't they? I wish they could ...
