Here are my thoughts/questions:
1. Not to be judgmental, but do you understand how control chart method works? The control limits are a function of the data and in particular how the data was obtained. First, the IMR chart is used for cases where there are no rational subgroups (you can do better at understanding and assigning sources of variation when you can create rational subgroups as a function of rational hypotheses. The MR chart answers the question is the variation in consecutive "data points" consistent and stable. The Individual chart answers the questions is there variation over and above the variation captured or predicted in the MR chart (the control limits are a function of the MR).
2. How did you get the "user defined" control limits? Are they appropriate to use for the given data set? What sources of variation would be captured in consecutive data points? What sources of variation would change over time (between subgroups)?
3. You can, of course, do any comparisons you want and chart the data however you want, but control charts are intended to do a specific comparison. They are intended to compare sources of variation (this is what the X-bar or individual charts do), however in order to do the comparison, you must first determine if the basis for comparison is stable. This is the purpose oof the Range or Moving Range chart. The range chart should always be assessed first to determine if the comparison is reasonable.
Please read Wheeler's books and papers:
Wheeler, Donald, and Chambers, David (1992) “Understanding Statistical Process Control” SPC Press (ISBN 0-945320-13-2)
Wheeler, Donald (2015) “Rational Sampling”, Quality Digest
Wheeler, Donald (2015) “Rational Subgrouping”, Quality Digest
And if you have the interest, the originator of the control chart method:
Shewhart, Walter A. (1931) “Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product”, D. Van Nostrand Co., NY
"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box