Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Why are ANOVA tables giving different results?

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 9:55 AM
(752 views)

Hello,

I am trying to build a linear model where X1 = Time and X2 = Treatment. When I use the Fit Model tool, I am seeing a discrepancy in the ANOVA table and the Effects table (screenshot below). The Sum of Squares columns should add to the same total (in this case, 6277.9477), correct? The SS under Effects Tests does not sum to this value. Why would this be? Am I misunderstanding the calculations here? Or is this a bug in JMP?

Many thanks!

5 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 10:39 AM
(740 views)

This is not a JMP bug. The Sums of Squares will add up if you are using what is called Type I Sum of Squares (Type I SS). The problem with Type I SS is that it is order dependent. That means that the model A, B, and A*B would give different results than the model B, A, B*A. Therefore, Type I SS are not usually used except in "by hand" calculations.

What JMP is using is the Type III Sum of Squares (Type III SS). That removes the order dependency by only calculating the SS for a term AFTER all other terms have been put in the model. This provides stable estimates, but they are not additive to the model SS.

Dan Obermiller

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 10:49 AM
(738 views)

Thanks Dan. If I can ask a follow-up...

This experiment is a full factorial with 7 time points, 4 treatments, and 2 replicates. My understanding is that, in a balanced design (which this is), the factors are orthogonal, so Type I, Type II, and Type III Sums of Squares should all be identical. So why would they be different?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 11:04 AM
(735 views)

That is not what orthogonal means. Orthogonal means that the SS would stay the same when removing terms (regardless of which type of SS are being used). Orthogonal has nothing to do with the order that terms are entered into the model.

Dan Obermiller

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 11:25 AM
(731 views)

One more thing. If you WANT the Type I Sum of Squares, from the red triangle by the response name, choose Estimates > Sequential Tests.

Dan Obermiller

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 1, 2017 11:28 AM
(729 views)

This widget could not be displayed.