cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319521%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EMuy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319521%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERealic%C3%A9%20un%20dise%C3%B1o%20personalizado%20para%207%20factores%20con%20un%20modelo%20que%20contiene%20efectos%20principales%2C%20interacciones%20y%20poderes%20de%202%20%C3%B3rdenes.%20El%20tama%C3%B1o%20de%20la%20muestra%20es%20150.%20Veo%20que%203%20de%20los%20factores%20son%20importantes%20e%20hicieron%20un%20modelo%20para%20estas%203%20variables.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESin%20embargo%2C%20me%20enfrent%C3%A9%20a%20un%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%20y%20un%20valor%20de%200%2C99%20R%20%5E%202.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBusqu%C3%A9%20mucho%20sobre%20las%20razones%20de%20esta%20situaci%C3%B3n%2C%20pero%20no%20pude%20encontrar%20una%20respuesta%20clara.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%BFTienes%20alguna%20idea%20al%20respecto%2C%20qu%C3%A9%20causa%20este%20problema%3F%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-319521%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EAcceso%20a%20los%20datos%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EDise%C3%B1o%20de%20experimentos%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3ELa%20personalizaci%C3%B3n%20en%20masa%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319964%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319964%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F19810%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ella%3C%2FA%3E%20Los%20pasos%20detallados%20para%20ejecutar%20el%20flujo%20de%20trabajo%20que%20sugiero%20en%20mi%20%C3%BAltima%20respuesta%20a%20este%20hilo%20son%20demasiados%2C%20detallados%20y%20extensos%2C%20y%20algunos%20dependen%20en%20gran%20medida%20de%20la%20experiencia%20en%20el%20dominio%20m%C3%A1s%20que%20de%20una%20teor%C3%ADa%20o%20t%C3%A9cnica%20estad%C3%ADstica%20para%20articular%20en%20un%20hilo%20del%20Foro%20de%20discusi%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20comunidad%20de%20usuarios%20de%20JMP.%20Tengo%20dos%20sugerencias%20para%20usted%20a%20partir%20de%20este%20momento%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E1.%20Como%20parece%20que%20tiene%20poca%20o%20ninguna%20experiencia%20previa%20en%20el%20uso%20de%20JMP%2C%20DOE%20y%20modelado%20para%20problemas%20de%20optimizaci%C3%B3n%20de%20procesos%2C%20busque%20a%20alguien%20en%20su%20organizaci%C3%B3n%2C%20o%20contrate%20a%20un%20consultor%2C%20que%20haya%20hecho%20esto%20antes%20y%20tenga%20algo%20de%20experiencia.%20Por%20lo%20menos%2C%20podr%C3%A1n%20guiarlo%20a%20trav%C3%A9s%20de%20los%20flujos%20de%20trabajo%20de%20la%20plataforma%2C%20ofrecer%20sugerencias%20a%20lo%20largo%20del%20camino%20y%20hacer%20preguntas%20estimulantes%20que%20lo%20ayudar%C3%A1n%20a%20continuar%20enmarcando%20su%20problema%20y%20enfoques%20para%20una%20soluci%C3%B3n.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E2.%20Si%20realmente%20est%C3%A1%20solo%20y%20no%20tiene%20otros%20recursos%20t%C3%A9cnicos%20disponibles%20para%20un%20flujo%20de%20trabajo%20detallado%20de%20lo%20que%20estoy%20sugiriendo%2C%20le%20recomiendo%20mirar%20este%20blog%20y%20video%20de%20JMP%20escrito%20por%20mi%20antiguo%20colega%20(estoy%20jubilado).%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F880%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20%40robert_anderson%3C%2FA%3E%20.%20La%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20del%20blog%20muestra%20el%20flujo%20de%20trabajo%20b%C3%A1sico%20y%20ofrece%20orientaci%C3%B3n%20sobre%20c%C3%B3mo%20navegar%20por%20el%20ecosistema%20JMP%20para%20hacer%20operativo%20el%20flujo%20de%20trabajo%20que%20sugiero.%20Aqu%C3%AD%20hay%20un%20enlace%20a%20la%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20del%20blog%3A%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Blog%2FFinding-the-best-process-operating-conditions-using-2%2Fm-p%2F30530%23U30530%22%20class%3D%22lia-mention-container-editor-message%20lia-img-icon-blog-thread%20lia-fa-icon%20lia-fa-blog%20lia-fa-thread%20lia-fa%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20Encontrar%20las%20mejores%20condiciones%20de%20operaci%C3%B3n%20del%20proceso%20utilizando%202%20enfoques%20de%20optimizaci%C3%B3n%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EMuchas%20gracias%20Sr.%20Bartell%2C%20veo%20que%20apuntas%20y%20es%20muy%20l%C3%B3gico.%20comprar%20No%20puedo%20entender%20exactamente%20su%20sugerencia%20sobre%20la%20simulaci%C3%B3n%20de%20Monte%20Carlo.%20%C2%BFPodr%C3%ADas%20explicarlo%20en%20detalle%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319781%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319781%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F19810%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ella%3C%2FA%3E%20Si%20su%20valor%20objetivo%20est%C3%A1%20entre%200%2C35%20y%200%2C36%2C%20su%20variaci%C3%B3n%20prevista%20no%20es%20de%20-0%2C3%20a%200%2C3%2C%20sino%20m%C3%A1s%20cercana%20a%20%2B%2F-%200%2C1.%20Y%20sospecho%20que%20el%20mayor%20contribuyente%20a%20la%20variaci%C3%B3n%20residual%20en%20este%20espacio%20se%20debe%20a%20cambios%20de%20factores...%20no%20LOF.%20Eche%20un%20vistazo%20a%20la%20gr%C3%A1fica%20residual%20en%20la%20vecindad%20de%200.35%20y%200.36%20para%20ver%20mi%20punto.%20Aqu%C3%AD%20hay%20un%20pensamiento%20de%20seguimiento%20para%20usted%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELe%20sugiero%20llevar%20su%20an%C3%A1lisis%20hasta%20el%20JMP%20Prediction%20Profiler%20y%20luego%20usar%20las%20capacidades%20de%20Deseabilidad%20y%20Deseabilidad%20de%20JMP%20para%20encontrar%20un%20espacio%20de%20factor%20%C3%B3ptimo%20centrado%20en%200.355%20con%20l%C3%ADmites%20superiores%20e%20inferiores%20de%20la%20Funci%C3%B3n%20de%20Deseabilidad%20de%20JMP%20en%200.35%20y%200.36.%20Luego%2C%20si%20tiene%20alg%C3%BAn%20conocimiento%20del%20proceso%20de%20cu%C3%A1nto%20esperar%20que%20var%C3%ADen%20los%20factores%20en%20esas%20recomendaciones%2F%C3%B3ptimos%20de%20factores%2C%20ejecute%20una%20simulaci%C3%B3n%20de%20Monte%20Carlo%20dentro%20del%20Prediction%20Profiler%20para%20ver%20cu%C3%A1l%20es%20la%20variaci%C3%B3n%20en%20su%20respuesta.%20Si%20la%20variaci%C3%B3n%20de%20su%20factor%20simulado%20en%20la%20simulaci%C3%B3n%20es%20relativamente%20grande%2C%20LOF%20ser%C3%A1%20el%20menor%20de%20sus%20problemas.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319752%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319752%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ELa%20raz%C3%B3n%20exacta%20de%20LOF%20es%20una%20variaci%C3%B3n%20muy%20peque%C3%B1a%20de%20las%20r%C3%A9plicas%2C%20como%20tambi%C3%A9n%20se%20ve%20en%20el%20valor%20de%20error%20puro.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20El%20objetivo%20de%20este%20estudio%20es%20modelar%20la%20variable%20dependiente%20y%20hacer%20la%20optimizaci%C3%B3n%20para%20encontrar%20niveles%20de%20factor%20%C3%B3ptimos%20que%20devuelvan%20dep.%20La%20variable%20est%C3%A1%20entre%200%2C35%20y%200%2C36.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Si%20observa%20los%20valores%20de%20error%20de%20mi%20modelo%20actual%2C%20est%C3%A1n%20cambiando%20entre%20-0.3%20y%200.3%2C%20lo%20cual%20es%20muy%20grande%20para%20mi%20objetivo.%20Es%20por%20eso%20que%20estoy%20tratando%20de%20encontrar%20un%20mejor%20modelo%20que%20explique%20mi%20variable%20dependiente%20para%20hacer%20un%20mejor%20pron%C3%B3stico.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319727%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319727%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3Ecoincido%20con%20todo%20eso%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F3194%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20%40Dan_Obermiller%3C%2FA%3E%20contribuido.%20A%20partir%20de%20su%20gr%C3%A1fico%20de%20residuos%2C%20parece%20que%20la%20causa%20principal%20de%20la%20falta%20de%20ajuste%20es%20una%20variaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20respuesta%20replicada%20relativamente%20peque%C3%B1a%20en%20comparaci%C3%B3n%20con%20la%20variaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20respuesta%20total.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAqu%C3%AD%20hay%20otro%20pensamiento%20para%20que%20lo%20consideres...%20%C2%BFcu%C3%A1l%20es%20el%20prop%C3%B3sito%20del%20experimento%2Festudio%3F%20Si%20se%20trata%20de%20una%20predicci%C3%B3n%20en%20el%20espacio%20de%20factores%2C%20%C2%BFqu%C3%A9%20impacto%20tiene%20la%20magnitud%20del%20error%20de%20predicci%C3%B3n%20en%20el%20espacio%20experimental%20desde%20un%20punto%20de%20vista%20PR%C3%81CTICO%3F%20Si%20hace%20poca%20diferencia%20pr%C3%A1ctica%2C%20entonces%2C%20francamente%2C%20no%20podr%C3%ADa%20importarme%20menos%20que%20tengas%20LOF.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319638%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319638%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EMuchas%20gracias%20Dan%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMe%20enfrento%20exactamente%20a%20todos%20los%20problemas%20que%20ha%20mencionado.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eproblema%20de%20normalidad%20en%20t%C3%A9rminos%20de%20error%2C%20creo%20que%20tengo%20alguna%20tendencia%20en%20mi%20t%C3%A9rmino%20de%20error%20(si%20tiene%20una%20opini%C3%B3n%20diferente%2C%20por%20favor%20comp%C3%A1rtala%20conmigo)%20y%20una%20variaci%C3%B3n%20de%20error%20puro%20muy%2C%20muy%20peque%C3%B1a.%3C%2FP%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22mceNonEditable%20lia-copypaste-placeholder%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%201.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20734px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%201.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20734px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%201.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20734px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F27286i634BE784F1F34573%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture%201.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22Capture%201.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%203.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20940px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%203.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20940px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture%203.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20940px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F27287i9C758DD3A9CA1AAE%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture%203.GIF%22%20alt%3D%22Capture%203.GIF%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture2%20.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20754px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture2%20.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20754px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture2%20.GIF%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20754px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F27288i358DA8F0EFE4B509%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture2%20.GIF%22%20alt%3D%22Capture2%20.GIF%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22mceNonEditable%20lia-copypaste-placeholder%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22mceNonEditable%20lia-copypaste-placeholder%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CP%3ESi%20redise%C3%B1o%20el%20experimento%20e%20incluyo%20el%20t%C3%A9rmino%20c%C3%BAbico%20del%20factor%2C%20%C2%BFresuelvo%20este%20problema%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(Por%20cierto%2C%20s%C3%A9%20que%20mi%20variable%20dependiente%20depende%20de%20otros%20factores%20que%20no%20est%C3%A1n%20incluidos%20en%20el%20modelo%2C%20pero%20los%20configuro%20constantes%20cuando%20hago%20DOE%20y%20ejecuto%20experimentos.%20Supongo%20que%20esto%20no%20causa%20este%20problema%2C%20%C2%BFverdad%3F)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22mceNonEditable%20lia-copypaste-placeholder%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319580%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319580%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EUna%20prueba%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%20compara%20la%20varianza%20del%20%22modelo%20que%20no%20se%20ajusta%22%20a%20la%20varianza%20de%20los%20puntos%20replicados%20(error%20puro).%20Un%20resultado%20significativo%20significa%20que%20la%20varianza%20del%20%22modelo%20no%20se%20ajusta%22%20es%20mayor%20que%20el%20error%20puro.%20La%20causa%20m%C3%A1s%20probable%20es%20que%20el%20formulario%20modelo%20que%20est%C3%A1%20utilizando%20no%20sea%20apropiado%20para%20los%20datos.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EConsidere%20esta%20imagen%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20381px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20381px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20381px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F27274iD237B5D8A6350C7E%2Fimage-dimensions%2F381x629%3Fv%3Dv2%22%20width%3D%22381%22%20height%3D%22629%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EUn%20valor%20alto%20de%20RSquare%2C%20pero%20una%20falta%20significativa%20de%20ajuste%20porque%20una%20l%C3%ADnea%20recta%20no%20describe%20la%20relaci%C3%B3n.%20Recuerde%20que%20un%20RSquare%20alto%20por%20s%C3%AD%20solo%20no%20significa%20que%20tenga%20un%20buen%20modelo.%20Un%20RScuadrado%20alto%20significa%20que%20ha%20explicado%20gran%20parte%20de%20la%20variaci%C3%B3n%20en%20la%20respuesta%2C%20pero%20es%20posible%20que%20todav%C3%ADa%20no%20tenga%20un%20buen%20modelo.%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22font-family%3A%20inherit%3B%22%3EDebe%20considerar%20otros%20elementos%20como%20la%20importancia%20del%20modelo%2C%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20residual%2C%20etc.%20para%20determinar%20si%20tiene%20un%20buen%20modelo.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EPor%20lo%20tanto%2C%20recomendar%C3%ADa%20trazar%20los%20residuos%20de%20su%20modelo%20para%20ver%20si%20hay%20alg%C3%BAn%20patr%C3%B3n.%20Un%20patr%C3%B3n%20indicar%C3%ADa%20qu%C3%A9%20podr%C3%ADa%20estar%20mal%20con%20su%20forma%20de%20modelo%20actual.%20Tambi%C3%A9n%20verifique%20para%20asegurarse%20de%20que%20los%20residuos%20sigan%20una%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20normal%2C%20ya%20que%20eso%20tambi%C3%A9n%20podr%C3%ADa%20conducir%20a%20una%20situaci%C3%B3n%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EFinalmente%2C%20es%20posible%20obtener%20una%20prueba%20significativa%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%20si%20sus%20puntos%20replicados%20tienen%20una%20varianza%20extremadamente%20baja%20en%20lugar%20de%20que%20la%20forma%20del%20modelo%20sea%20incorrecta.%20Esto%20no%20sucede%20tan%20a%20menudo%2C%20pero%20lo%20he%20visto%20ocurrir.%20En%20tales%20situaciones%2C%20debe%20buscar%20determinar%20por%20qu%C3%A9%20o%20c%C3%B3mo%20logr%C3%B3%20una%20variaci%C3%B3n%20tan%20baja.%20Eso%20puede%20proporcionar%20algunas%20buenas%20ideas.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-319541%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Muy%20alto%20R%20cuadrado%20y%20problema%20significativo%20de%20falta%20de%20ajuste%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-319541%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%C2%BFEs%20posible%20compartir%20sus%20datos%20y%20script%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Ella
Level II

Very High R square and significant lack of fit problem

Hi,

I made custom design for 7 factors with a model containing main effects, interractions and 2 order powers. Number of sample size is 150. I see that 3 of factors are important and made model for these 3 variables.

However i faced with significant lack of fit problem and 0.99 R^2 value.

I searched a lot about the reasons of this situation but i could not find a clear answer.

Do you have an idea about it, what causes this problem?   

Kind regards.

 

11 REPLIES 11
modelFit
Level II

Re: Very High R square and significant lack of fit problem

@Ella It seems to me that you have unmodeled mean structure remaining in the residuals. By the looks of it you fit f(X) = a + bX + e and by observation, the model f(X) = a + b1X + b2X^2 + e may provide a better fit? What do you residual look like if you run the latter model?

statman
Super User

Re: Very High R square and significant lack of fit problem

Just to re-iterate, R-square by itself must be interpreted carefully.  R-square will always increase as you add DF's to the model.  But the point of creating a model is to include only the useful terms (active and significant).  So you should look at the delta between the R-square and the R-square adjusted.  As the delta increases, it is an indicator your model is over specified.

Looking at your residuals, there is an indication of a non-linear effect.  Your model should consider perhaps adding a quadratic effect as suggested by @modelFit 

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

Recommended Articles