turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Test For Curvature In 2 level full factorial with ...

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Oct 13, 2015 8:32 AM
(1095 views)

4 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Oct 13, 2015 9:17 AM
(641 views)

Hello schuprj,

You have at least a couple of options for checking curvature. First is to plot the residual by predicted values under the red hot spot when you use Fit Model to build your model. Go to Row Diagnostics > Plot residual by predicted. Look at the scatter of the residual points and see if they are random or in some sort of pattern. Another option is to fit a main effects only model and then fit a response surface model. Two things will happen if there is curvature. Your fit model will improve if any of the quadratic terms are important to your model and you will see the curvature in your prediction profiler where the curvature terms are active.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Oct 13, 2015 9:38 AM
(641 views)

Thanks for your quick post. As followup or clarification, a fairly

standard and simple test for curvature in this situation is to compare the

average of the center points to the average of the corner points. If this

difference is big enough then you probably have curvature and this warrants

further study to identify which factor(s). I can do this test manually in

JMP but thought that a fairly standard test like this would be displayable

somewhere in the dialogue. If not, so be it.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Oct 13, 2015 10:31 AM
(641 views)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Oct 15, 2015 2:35 AM
(641 views)

Hi schurpj,

Regarding to your lack of fit comment. Lack of fit - if significant - shows you there is something missing in the model which would improve the model significantly. This does not necessarily have to be a quadratic effect. it also could be a missing interaction effect or something you didn't measure but will have effect on your response.

"The difference between the error sum of squares from the model and the pure error sum of squares is called the lack of fit sum of squares. The lack of fit variation can be significantly greater than pure error variation if the model is not adequate. For example, you might have the wrong functional form for a predictor, or you might not have enough, or the correct, interaction effects in your model." (documentation)