cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Use World Cup data to build models, explore spatial relationships, and create informative visualizations in JMP. Register. July 17, 2 pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
camhilker
Level I

Stability analysis on pH

Hello,

 

I am running a stability study on several lots of a buffer solution based on the measured pH over time.

 

I noticed that the stability analysis in JMP fits the data to a linear degradation model.

 

Is this appropriate to use for a pH analysis since the pH scale follows a log base 10 relationship?

Would it be more appropriate to first convert the values to [H3O+] concentration? (Or, is there an alternate model to use in JMP?)

 

 

Thank you,

Cam

2 REPLIES 2

Re: Stability analysis on pH

It is desirable to to model the response in the natural scale. You measure pH because it is more meaningful. Because the p function linearizes relationships with hydronium activity! So go ahead and enter pH directly as the response for stability analysis.

statman
Super User

Re: Stability analysis on pH

Welcome to the community!

 

I'm not sure what it is you want to do?  Do you want to understand how consistent the pH is from lot-to-lot, within lot, over time?  What about measurement error?  Do you expect the pH to change over time or are you expecting it to be relatively constant? How are the "lots" made?

 

As Mark suggests, there is no reason to not just plot the pH values over time and perhaps a nested study would be appropriate.

 

There are, of course, multiple ways to perform the analysis in JMP.  The graphical approach (traditional control chart method) is, IMHO, the best, but regardless the graphical technique, you'll still need to interpret the charts from the eyes of the scientist. 

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

Recommended Articles