If I understand "my hypothesis is that there is no difference for median value between two independent groups" correctly, then the null hypothesis is that there is a difference. This situation is sometimes referred to a equivalence test, although it is really still a hypothesis test. It is just that they usual null hypothesis (i.e., no difference) and alternative hypothesis (i.e., difference) are reversed.
The case of deciding about the equivalence of the mean of two groups is based on two one-sided tests (TOST) with t-tests. Perhaps you could apply one-side non-parametric tests in the same way.
(The underlying issue is that a hypothesis test is one way. Failing to reject the null hypothesis means that you still assume the null hypothesis. You can't say that the null hypothesis is significant.)