cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
frankderuyck
Level VI

Midpoint control range Design Space Profiler is not transferred to Defect simulator?

Using Design Space profiler control ranges of a three component mixture and one process factor = time are specified.

As shown in graph below transfer of all control ranges work fine however the midpoint of time is not taken over from the Design Space profiler? For the mixture components midpoints are transferred, why not for the process time effect?

frankderuyck_0-1700235764076.png

Another remark is that Defect rate (volume) of Design Space Porfiler is much (one magnitute order) lower than defect rate after simulation?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Victor_G
Super User

Re: Midpoint control range Design Space Profiler is not transferred to Defect simulator?

Hi @frankderuyck,

 

Again, I found this old post without response, so I wanted to provide one for future users documentation.

In the Design Space Profiler options (red triangle), you have an option "Send Midpoints to Profiler" that should work. If not working for one factor, make sure that all column properties for this factor are correctly configured.

 

Concerning the Defect rate and its link to information from Design Space Profiler, you should compare Defect Rate from Simulator to (1-InSpec Portion)x100 information from Design Space Profiler, as mentioned in my previous response here :

Different minimal defect control range for defect profiler versus design space p... - JMP User Commu...

Depending on the distributions choice in the Simulator and results from Monte-Carlo simulations, you can expect some differences, but they should stay reasonable.

The Volume Portion represents the proportion of the total data that is within the current factor limits : Design Space Profiler Report

 

Hope this answer may help other users,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Victor_G
Super User

Re: Midpoint control range Design Space Profiler is not transferred to Defect simulator?

Hi @frankderuyck,

 

Again, I found this old post without response, so I wanted to provide one for future users documentation.

In the Design Space Profiler options (red triangle), you have an option "Send Midpoints to Profiler" that should work. If not working for one factor, make sure that all column properties for this factor are correctly configured.

 

Concerning the Defect rate and its link to information from Design Space Profiler, you should compare Defect Rate from Simulator to (1-InSpec Portion)x100 information from Design Space Profiler, as mentioned in my previous response here :

Different minimal defect control range for defect profiler versus design space p... - JMP User Commu...

Depending on the distributions choice in the Simulator and results from Monte-Carlo simulations, you can expect some differences, but they should stay reasonable.

The Volume Portion represents the proportion of the total data that is within the current factor limits : Design Space Profiler Report

 

Hope this answer may help other users,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)
frankderuyck
Level VI

Re: Midpoint control range Design Space Profiler is not transferred to Defect simulator?

OK Victor, thanks for reply!