I have a large script that relies on the x/y platform to greate a logistic regression of a binary variable as function of a continuous variable.
i then use the report to extract the fit parameters of the linear term of the regression. then i use the estimate to predict the probability of Yes and No and display results to the user.
as of JMP 16.0 suddenly the script reports as result the "complement to 100%" of the right expected number.
looking deeper i realized that now the regression changes the sign of both parameters (eg. it reports the fit for the probability of yes as opposed to the probability of no)
similarly if i export the probability formula in the table it reports the opposite linear term (lin[no] vs lin[yes])
the probabilities yes/no are calculated accordingly in the table but my model that is based on the fitting parameters no longer works properly.
to work around the problem i added an if statement based on JMP version to my code but i wanted to check if the change was intentional (e.g. it will stay as such for the future versions) or it is the result of a bug so my workaround will give me wrong results in the future.
Thanks