Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.
Created:
Nov 24, 2021 11:09 AM
| Last Modified: Nov 24, 2021 8:10 AM(5632 views)
| Posted in reply to message from sigi2408 11-24-2021
The first image in your post (the histogram) can't be used to determine the value of A when C = 0. You can determine the value of A when C = 0 by solving the regression equation in second image by substituting 0 for C and then algebraically solving the equation 0 = 5.565 - 2.067*A. Or do it the cool way...use the JMP cross hair tool from the tool bar and find the value of A when you put the cross hairs over the red line when C = 0. Either way the answer is 2.69.
Or another cool way: Use Fit Model instead of Fit Y by X. then you can use Inverse Prediction. You don't need to do any calculation or guessing with the crosshairs. Plus, you will even get a 95% confidence interval for the possible A value.
That's one of the cool things about JMP...very often there are multiple ways to visualize, interpret, and gain insight wrt to data and a problem at hand. One thing I always coached my JMP user friends is "Try them all!" You might find something unique you weren't even looking for! Then the real fun begins:)
I don't get 3.6 either. But your bivariate plot does not look linear to me - I think a quadratic would fit better. Did you try that? The value of C when A=0 will be higher than the 2.69 that txnelson calculated. In any case, you should provide a bit more context to your question: what exactly were you asked to do? Was a linear regression a condition for the question?