cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • See how to use the JMP Marketplace – Free tools to expand JMP capabilities. Register. July 10, 2 pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
scappuccio
Level II

Johnson Su Transformation Parameter Discrepancy

Hello from a novice user. Our organization recently updated to JMP 17 from JMP 15. The typical extent of my analysis is evaluating data sets for normality and calculating tolerance intervals. It came to my attention that using the "Enable Legacy Fitters" tool and utilizing a Johnson Su transformation will yield different transformation parameters than using the new "Fit Johnson," even if Johnson Su results is the best fit. Additionally, forcing a Johnson Su transformation can situationally result in a normally distributed data set whereas using the new transformation on the same distribution will result in a non-normal data set.

 

I have attached an example of this and would appreciate any insight as to why this may happen and how I can better utilize the Johnson Transformation function.

1 REPLY 1
ashwint27
Level III

Re: Johnson Su Transformation Parameter Discrepancy

I would also like any guidance on this inquiry.  I noticed the same thing and wondering if an explanation can be provided.

Recommended Articles