Another difference is speed.
The video below shows the 3 cases:
- "Copy Columns with column names" / "Paste Columns with column names" (just the entries, no column properties)
- "Copy Columns" / " Paste Columns": no row selection (just the column structure is created)
- "Copy Columns" / " Paste Columns": all rows selected -> column structure + entries
The 3rd approach is very comfortable:
It can be used to create precise copies of the original columns - including all column properties AND the values.
But the user has to pay for the comfort - with time.
"Paste columns" takes time - like in the video!
For larger tables, it can take minutes or hours to create the new columns.
If you want to copy and paste columns, including all their properties and entries,
... and the data table is large,
You can save hours by doing it in two steps:
Either:
- copy/paste the structure via Copy Columns & Paste Columns (with no rows selected)
- copy/ paste the content via CTRL+C & CTRL+V
Or vice versa:
- "Copy Columns with column names" & "Paste Columns with column names" (just the entries, no column properties)
- add the column properties via Column Header / right Click / "Copy Columns Properties" & "Paste Columns Properties"
@NoFinalAnswer wrote:
Jmp has about the highest complexity I've seen for basic operations like copying columns.
agree ...
There are many different ways to complete tasks in JMP. And for a specific purpose, one approach can be much better than another.
For a slightly different purpose, the opposite may be true.
It's not always easy to know or remember which approach is the right one, and sometimes the user ends up with a frozen program as a result.