cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
bbenny7
Level III

Inverse prediction from Fit curve, Fit model and Degradation

Hi,

 

I have used the inverse prediction from three platforms (Fit Curve, Fit Model and Degradation).

The predicted value is the same, but the confidence interval is not. Fit Model and Degradation give the same interval, but this interval is wider than the one reported by the Fit Curve platform.

 

I have attched an example with mackup degradation data in which I make linear a linear fit. I want to predict the time to a cartain value.

 

Why is there a difference? Which one should consider?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
rcast15
Level III

Re: Inverse prediction from Fit curve, Fit model and Degradation

The fit least squares platform uses t values and the fit curve platform uses wald chisquare.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
rcast15
Level III

Re: Inverse prediction from Fit curve, Fit model and Degradation

The fit least squares platform uses t values and the fit curve platform uses wald chisquare.

Recommended Articles