cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-20233%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EIst%20es%20m%C3%B6glich%2C%20die%20Proportional-Hazards-Annahme%20in%20JMP%20zu%20%C3%BCberpr%C3%BCfen%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-20233%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CP%3EDie%20G%C3%BCltigkeit%20der%20Proportional-Hazards-Annahme%20ist%20eine%20Voraussetzung%2C%20um%20das%20Cox-Proportional-Hazards-Modell%20anzupassen%20oder%20den%20Log-Rank-Test%20in%20Survival%20zu%20berechnen.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWie%20k%C3%B6nnen%20wir%20diese%20Annahme%20in%20JMP%20%C3%BCberpr%C3%BCfen%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-20235%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Ist%20es%20m%C3%B6glich%2C%20die%20Proportional-Hazards-Annahme%20in%20JMP%20zu%20%C3%BCberpr%C3%BCfen%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-20235%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EVielen%20Dank%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20Benachrichtigung%20%C3%BCber%20meine%20Anfrage%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWinfried%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-20234%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Ist%20es%20m%C3%B6glich%2C%20die%20Proportional-Hazards-Annahme%20in%20JMP%20zu%20%C3%BCberpr%C3%BCfen%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-20234%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELeider%20verf%C3%BCgt%20JMP%20derzeit%20nicht%20%C3%BCber%20eine%20M%C3%B6glichkeit%2C%20die%20Proportional-Hazard-Annahme%20zu%20testen%2C%20wie%20Sie%20dies%20in%20SAS%20tun%20k%C3%B6nnen%2C%20was%20in%20diesem%20Whitepaper%20besprochen%20wird.%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mwsug.org%2Fproceedings%2F2006%2Fstats%2FMWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf%22%20title%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mwsug.org%2Fproceedings%2F2006%2Fstats%2FMWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mwsug.org%2Fproceedings%2F2006%2Fstats%2FMWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf%3C%2FA%3E%20.%20%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22color%3A%20%23000000%3B%20font-family%3A%20'Microsoft%20Sans%20Serif'%3B%20font-size%3A%2010.6667px%3B%22%3E%20%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAber%20deine%20Anfrage%20wurde%20notiert%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
dr_winfried_koc
Level III

Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?

The validity of the Proportional Hazards assumption is a prerequisite to fit the Cox proportional hazards model or to calculate the Log-rank test in Survival.

How can we check this assumption in JMP?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
jiancao
Staff

Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?

Unfortunately, JMP currently doesn't have a way to test the the proportional hazard assumption as you can do in SAS, which is discussed in this paper. http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2006/stats/MWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf.

But your request has been noted :)

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
jiancao
Staff

Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?

Unfortunately, JMP currently doesn't have a way to test the the proportional hazard assumption as you can do in SAS, which is discussed in this paper. http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2006/stats/MWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf.

But your request has been noted :)

dr_winfried_koc
Level III

Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?

Thank you for notification of my request

Winfried

Recommended Articles