cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • See how to use the JMP Marketplace – Free tools to expand JMP capabilities. Register. July 10, 2 pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Parrot943
Level I

Instead of Odds Ratio I see Decimal place?

Wondering how to fix this in JMP? 

 

I have successfully run three chi-squared tests, and found the the odds ratio for each of them. Why is JMP not returning an odds ratio in this case? 

 

Thanks for any help you are able to provide!

JMP screenshot.png

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
dlehman1
Level VI

Re: Instead of Odds Ratio I see Decimal place?

You really should show more of the JMP output (like the matrix), but I suspect that one of your off diagnonal entries is zero.  The odds ratio is computed by multiplying the on-diagonal entries (in the 2x2 matrix) and dividing that product by the product of the off-diagonal entries.  If either of the latter are zero, then that ratio is undefined.  I suspect that is why you are not getting an odds ratio.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
dlehman1
Level VI

Re: Instead of Odds Ratio I see Decimal place?

You really should show more of the JMP output (like the matrix), but I suspect that one of your off diagnonal entries is zero.  The odds ratio is computed by multiplying the on-diagonal entries (in the 2x2 matrix) and dividing that product by the product of the off-diagonal entries.  If either of the latter are zero, then that ratio is undefined.  I suspect that is why you are not getting an odds ratio.

Parrot943
Level I

Re: Instead of Odds Ratio I see Decimal place?

You are right - didn't catch this before. Thank you!

Recommended Articles