here you find 54 individual data, exponentially distributed.
JMP analyses the data and provides a STRANGE Control Chart
Why?
See the attached file
Fausto Galetto
In JMP Guide I found
In my JMP Student Edition at Rare Events I see
faustoG
To my knowledge, JMP Student Edition should be exactly the same as JMP Pro (except for different licensing) https://www.jmp.com/en_fi/academic/licensing-for-students.html . Which JMP version are you using? 18?
I have referred to this earlier https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.0/#page/jmp/rare-event-control-charts.shtml
Yes: JMP Student version 18
you show
It IS NONSENSE, from JMP
I do not know how they justify that...
YOU can use "picosecond" and transform a fraction of a second into an integer value
Multiply the values in my document by 1000 and make the T Chart, IF you want.
Let's see what happens
faustoG
I can verify that, at least on my JMP Pro 18, the T chart does require integer values. I'm not sure why - and I'm not clear on why that should be necessary mathematically or conceptually (perhaps it is a computational reason specific to JMP, but I don't know). In any case, it isn't clear to me that your data is measuring the time between events. You still haven't described what is being measured. Nor do I understand what you are saying is wrong with the control limits I calculated in the file I attached. Please refrain from the caps, bold fonts, and harsh words - it might be due to a language difference - but regardless I find it distracting and disturbing. I don't use control charts much and so I don't have much background with anything but the most straightforward ones - which your case is not. I'd like to understand what is appropriate for your data and I'm trying to help as well. The section you quote that "a traditional plot of these data might contain many points at zero" also does not seem to match your data (which does not have this characteristic). I know it would help me understand what is going on if you can say something about what these measurements are.
You write
This is taken from the document that shows the data
(I do not know anything more). So, please, ...
====================================================================================
Does this help with the data analysis?
You say also:
As I said previously
You say, also:
faustoG
A P-chart seems appropriate for tracking the number of patients with UTI ('defectives'), with the sample size being the total number of patients discharged in the same period. The Poisson distribution is used for counts such as this case.
Thank you, BUT it is not useful for my "JMP Student Edition".
I hope it is useful for other people in the Community.
faustoG
Thank you.
I'll come back as soon as I analysed the Control Chart and the Bruno File
faustoG
Dear: dlehman1 (Level V)
Your further explanation definitely helps me. Your data is the time between events (I'm not sure why there was a description saying that such data often has many zeros - yours has no zeros and I would think zero time between events would be fairly unusual). In any case, I did as you suggest and multiplied the data by 1000 and rounded it to integers, so I am able to get the T chart with sigma set from a Weibull distribution. I'm attaching a picture of the T chart as well as the "standard" IR chart where I defined the LCL and UCL according to the formula in the document I had linked to. The pictures are similar, although the control limits don't match. I'm not sure why - and it could either be the document's formula being incorrect or it could be differences between the Weibull and fitted Exponential distributions. Both show the same qualitative result - that the process seems to be stable. But the large differences in the control limits means someone with more knowledge will need to comment. And, yes, I don't like caps.