cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-629019%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ECome%20interpreto%20i%20risultati%20di%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-629019%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHo%20due%20domande%20sui%20risultati%20di%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3COL%3E%3CLI%3ESe%20calcolo%20un%20valore%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%20con%206*StdDev%2C%20devo%20riportare%20l'incertezza%20di%20misura%20come%20%2B-3*StdDev%20con%20intervallo%20di%20confidenza%20di%2099%2C73%3F%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EPoich%C3%A9%20JMP%20adatta%20alcuni%20modelli%20per%20calcolare%20i%20diversi%20componenti%2C%20c'%C3%A8%20qualche%20errore%20con%20questi%20valori%3F%20Il%20motivo%20per%20cui%20lo%20chiedo%20%C3%A8%20perch%C3%A9%20ho%20due%20diversi%20set%20di%20dati%20e%20vorrei%20sapere%20se%20la%20differenza%20che%20vedo%20%C3%A8%20statisticamente%20significativa.%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FOL%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-629019%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EQualit%C3%A0%20e%20ingegneria%20di%20processo%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-629208%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Come%20interpreto%20i%20risultati%20di%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-629208%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EEsatto%2C%20la%20precisione%20del%20tuo%20sistema%20di%20misurazione%20%C3%A8%20%2B%2F-%3CSPAN%3E%203*StdDev%20se%20si%20desidera%20che%20contenga%20il%2099%2C73%25%20della%20distribuzione%20dell'errore%20di%20misurazione.%C3%88%20possibile%20regolare%20l'X*StdDev%20segnalato%20in%20base%20alla%20criticit%C3%A0%20dell'errore%20di%20misurazione.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3ESe%20fai%20clic%20con%20il%20pulsante%20destro%20del%20mouse%20sulla%20casella%20Variance%20Components%20for%20GRR%20puoi%20richiedere%20i%20livelli%20di%20confidenza%20del%2095%25.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F52596iF8FDFF2A1542DA7A%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20alt%3D%22shampton82_0-1683310222858.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-629853%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Come%20interpreto%20i%20risultati%20di%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-629853%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20per%20la%20tua%20risposta%2C%20%C3%A8%20molto%20utile.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUn'altra%20domanda%3A%20la%20tabella%20dei%20componenti%20della%20varianza%20ha%20solo%20la%20riproducibilit%C3%A0%2C%20mentre%20la%20tabella%20Gauge%20R%26amp%3BR%20divide%20la%20riproducibilit%C3%A0%20in%20due%20parti%2C%20operatore%20e%20parte%20operatore*.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C3%88%20possibile%20ottenere%20la%20componente%20di%20varianza%20per%20queste%20due%20parti%20insieme%20a%2095%25%20inferiore%20e%2095%25%20superiore%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
bbenny7
Level III

How do I interpret Gauge R&R Results?

I have two questions about Gauge R&R results:

  1. If I calculate a Gauge R&R value with 6*StdDev, do I have to report the measurement uncertainty as +-3*StdDev with confidence interval of 99.73?
  2. Since JMP fits some models to calculate the different components, is there any error with these values? The reason I ask is because I have to two different sets of data, and I would like to know if the difference I see is statistically significant.

 

2 REPLIES 2
shampton82
Level VII

Re: How do I interpret Gauge R&R Results?

Correct, the precision of your measurement system is +/- 3*StdDev if you want to have it contain 99.73% of your measurement error distribution.  You can adjust the reported X*StdDev depending on the criticality of the measurement error.

 

If you right click on the Variance Components for GRR box you can ask for the 95% confidence levels.

shampton82_0-1683310222858.png

 

bbenny7
Level III

Re: How do I interpret Gauge R&R Results?

Thanks for your answer, it is very useful.

One more question: the variance components table has only Reproducibility, whereas the Gauge R&R table splits the Reproducibility in two parts, operator and operator*part.

Is it possible to get the variance component for these two parts together with 95% Lower and 95% Upper?

Recommended Articles