cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62291%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EAyuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62291%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%20a%20todos%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEstoy%20realizando%20una%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20en%20un%20conjunto%20de%20datos.%20Los%20datos%20prueban%20los%20efectos%20de%20un%20tratamiento%20y%20consisten%20en%2010%20sujetos.%20A%20cada%20sujeto%20se%20le%20midi%C3%B3%20la%20frecuencia%20card%C3%ADaca%20(FC)%20seis%20veces%20durante%20un%20per%C3%ADodo%20de%206%20horas.%20Para%20realizar%20la%20prueba%2C%20guard%C3%A9%20los%20rangos%20de%20recursos%20humanos%20(ordinales)%20y%20los%20configur%C3%A9%20como%20Y%20en%20el%20ajuste%20Y%20por%20X%2C%20los%20sujetos%20como%20'Bloque'%20y%20la%20'Hora'%20como%20X.%20Este%20es%20el%20resultado%20de%20las%20pruebas%20de%20Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel%2C%20pero%20tengo%20dificultades%20para%20interpretarlas.%20%C2%BFExiste%20un%20efecto%20significativo%20a%20pesar%20de%20que%20la%20correlaci%C3%B3n%20de%20puntuaciones%20es%20mucho%20mayor%20que%200%2C05%3FAdem%C3%A1s%2C%20si%20los%20resultados%20muestran%20que%20hay%20cambios%20significativos%20inducidos%20por%20el%20tratamiento%2C%20%C2%BFes%20apropiado%20realizar%20una%20prueba%20de%20todos%20los%20pares%20de%20Steel-Dwass%20en%20los%20datos%20nominales%20como%20una%20prueba%20post%20hoc%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Ctest.JPG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20819px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Ctest.JPG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20819px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Ctest.JPG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20819px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F11406i76BA9A0AAAE718CC%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Ctest.JPG%22%20alt%3D%22Ctest.JPG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Gracias%20por%20tu%20ayuda!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62406%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62406%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EGracias%20por%20las%20explicaciones%20y%20ayuda%20con%20este%20an%C3%A1lisis.%20%C2%A1Es%20de%20mucha%20ayuda!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62405%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62405%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EGenial%2C%20muchas%20gracias%20por%20tu%20explicaci%C3%B3n.%20Es%20de%20mucha%20ayuda%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62396%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62396%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELos%20residuales%20no%20proporcionan%20una%20mejor%20estimaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20normalidad.%20Proporcionan%20una%20evaluaci%C3%B3n%20m%C3%A1s%20relevante.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELa%20respuesta%20(frecuencia%20card%C3%ADaca)%20se%20modela%20como%20una%20combinaci%C3%B3n%20de%20efectos%20fijos%20(tratamiento%2C%20tiempo)%20y%20efectos%20aleatorios%20(sujetos%2C%20errores).%20La%20regresi%C3%B3n%20de%20m%C3%ADnimos%20cuadrados%20ordinarios%20utiliza%20un%20predictor%20lineal%20para%20los%20efectos%20fijos%20(respuesta%20media)%20y%20la%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20normal%20para%20los%20efectos%20aleatorios%20(varianza%20de%20respuesta).%20La%20respuesta%20se%20modela%20como%20la%20combinaci%C3%B3n%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20los%20datos%20no%20se%20pueden%20usar%20para%20evaluar%20la%20normalidad%20de%20la%20parte%20aleatoria.%20Primero%20se%20deben%20eliminar%20los%20efectos%20fijos.%20Los%20residuos%20son%20la%20respuesta%20observada%20(combinaci%C3%B3n)%20menos%20la%20respuesta%20media%20(efectos%20fijos)%20para%20cada%20observaci%C3%B3n.%20El%20resto%20(residual)%3CEM%3E%20debiera%20ser%3C%2FEM%3E%20la%20parte%20aleatoria.%20Guarde%20los%20residuos%20y%20examine%20su%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20antes%20de%20decidir%20que%20necesita%20un%20an%C3%A1lisis%20no%20param%C3%A9trico.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAdem%C3%A1s%2C%20muchas%20veces%2C%20cuando%20los%20residuos%20no%20son%20normales%2C%20una%20transformaci%C3%B3n%20de%20Y%20puede%20hacerlos%20normales.%20Esta%20t%C3%A9cnica%20le%20permite%20utilizar%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20medidas%20repetidas%20en%20una%20clase%20m%C3%A1s%20amplia%20de%20experimentos.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELa%20mayor%C3%ADa%20de%20los%20estad%C3%ADsticos%20que%20conozco%20no%20toman%20la%20prueba%20de%20Shapiro-Wilk%20demasiado%20en%20serio%2C%20ya%20que%20puede%20ser%20rid%C3%ADculamente%20demasiado%20sensible%2C%20especialmente%20para%20muestras%20de%20gran%20tama%C3%B1o.Muchas%20cosas%20que%20fallan%20en%20Shapiro-Wilk%20son%20lo%20suficientemente%20normales%20como%20para%20funcionar%20bien%20con%20m%C3%A9todos%20param%C3%A9tricos%20que%20asumen%20la%20normalidad.Siempre%20recomiendo%20mirar%20el%20diagrama%20de%20cuantiles%20normal%20y%20usar%20buen%20juicio.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAdem%C3%A1s%2C%20debe%20verificar%20absolutamente%20la%20normalidad%20en%3CEM%3E%20derechos%20residuales%20de%20autor%3C%2FEM%3E%20.Si%20tiene%20alg%C3%BAn%20efecto%20en%20sus%20datos%2C%20es%20probable%20que%20la%20totalidad%20de%20los%20datos%20no%20se%20vea%20normal.La%20suposici%C3%B3n%20gira%20en%20torno%20a%20los%20errores%2C%20no%20a%20los%20valores%20de%20los%20datos%20sin%20procesar.Imag%C3%ADnese%20si%20su%20modelo%20es%20de%202%20grupos%20donde%20hay%20un%20efecto%20de%20grupo%20grande.Cada%20grupo%20puede%20tener%20una%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20normal%2C%20pero%20todo%20el%20conjunto%20de%20datos%20se%20ver%C3%A1%20bimodal.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ENo%20mir%C3%A9%20los%20residuos.%20M%C3%A1s%20bien%2C%20apliqu%C3%A9%20la%20prueba%20de%20bondad%20de%20ajuste%20de%20Shapiro-Wilks%20a%20los%20datos%20al%20analizar%20la%20distribuci%C3%B3n.%20%C2%BFObservar%20los%20residuos%20proporcionar%C3%ADa%20una%20mejor%20estimaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20normalidad%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Gracias%20por%20confirmar%20que%20las%20instrucciones%20de%20an%C3%A1lisis%20eran%20correctas.%20Entonces%2C%20si%20mi%20enfoque%20fue%20correcto%2C%20%C2%BFhay%20un%20efecto%20significativo%20aunque%20la%20correlaci%C3%B3n%20de%20puntajes%20sea%20mucho%20mayor%20que%200.05%3F%20(como%20ped%C3%AD%20originalmente)%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%C2%A1Gracias%20de%20nuevo%20por%20tu%20ayuda!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62377%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62377%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EVeo%20por%20qu%C3%A9%20funcionan%20los%20rangos.%20Nunca%20me%20hab%C3%ADa%20acercado%20al%20an%C3%A1lisis%20no%20param%C3%A9trico%20de%20esta%20manera.%20Estabas%20siguiendo%20las%20instrucciones%20correctamente.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62376%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62376%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ENo%20se%20supone%20que%20los%20datos%20se%20distribuyan%20normalmente%20en%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20regresi%C3%B3n.%20%C2%BFQuiere%20decir%20que%20los%20residuos%20(errores%20estimados)%20no%20se%20distribuyen%20normalmente%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62372%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62372%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EDecid%C3%AD%20hacer%20una%20prueba%20no%20param%C3%A9trica%20porque%20la%20aplicaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Shapiro-Wilk%20sugiri%C3%B3%20que%20mis%20datos%20no%20se%20distribuyen%20normalmente.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHe%20realizado%20las%20medidas%20repetidas%2C%20pero%20me%20preocupa%20que%2C%20dado%20que%20mis%20datos%20podr%C3%ADan%20no%20cumplir%20con%20el%20supuesto%20de%20normalidad%2C%20existe%20una%20mayor%20probabilidad%20de%20errores%20de%20tipo%201.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELa%20p%C3%A1gina%20que%20cit%C3%A9%20dice%20que%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20es%20la%20versi%C3%B3n%20no%20param%C3%A9trica%20de%20las%20medidas%20repetidas%20y%20que%20deber%C3%ADa%20%22Calcular%20los%20rangos%20dentro%20de%20cada%20bloque.%20Defina%20esta%20nueva%20columna%20para%20que%20tenga%20un%20tipo%20de%20modelado%20ordinal.%20Ingrese%20los%20rangos%20como%20Y%20en%20la%20plataforma%20Fit%20Y%20by%20X.%20Introduzca%20uno%20de%20los%20efectos%20como%20variable%20de%20bloqueo.%20Obtenga%20las%20estad%C3%ADsticas%20de%20Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel%22.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEntonces%2C%20%C2%BFno%20deber%C3%ADa%20calcular%20los%20rangos%20de%20antemano%20y%20solo%20usar%20la%20variable%20continua%20en%20lugar%20de%20la%20variable%20ordinal%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Gracias%20por%20tu%20ayuda!%3C%2FP%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22Tip%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3CDIV%20class%3D%22Tip%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FDIV%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESugiero%20probar%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20medidas%20repetidas.%20Aseg%C3%BArese%20de%20que%20sus%20datos%20est%C3%A9n%20organizados%20como%20Frecuencia%20card%C3%ADaca%2C%20Tratamiento%2C%20Sujeto%20y%20Hora.%20Ver%20el%3CSTRONG%3E%20Un%20enfoque%20multivariado%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20ejemplo%20en%20la%20muestra%20que%20cit%C3%A9.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62354%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62354%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELos%20datos%20no%20son%20ni%20param%C3%A9tricos%20ni%20no%20param%C3%A9tricos.%20Los%20datos%20son%20continuos%20(medici%C3%B3n)%20o%20categ%C3%B3ricos%20(recuento%20nominal%20u%20ordinal).%20El%20an%C3%A1lisis%20es%20param%C3%A9trico%20o%20no%20param%C3%A9trico.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%C2%BFPor%20qu%C3%A9%20decidiste%20utilizar%20un%20an%C3%A1lisis%20no%20param%C3%A9trico%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESi%20decide%20continuar%20con%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20no%20param%C3%A9trico%2C%20sepa%20que%20JMP%20calcula%20las%20clasificaciones%20a%20partir%20de%20sus%20datos.%20No%20calcule%20los%20rangos%20de%20antemano%20y%20sustituya%20los%20rangos%20por%20los%20datos.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELa%20p%C3%A1gina%20que%20cit%C3%B3%20trata%20sobre%20comparaciones%20m%C3%BAltiples%20no%20param%C3%A9tricas.%20Es%20eso%20lo%20que%20necesita%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62348%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62348%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EHola%2C%20Mark%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Gracias%20por%20su%20respuesta.%20Mis%20datos%20no%20son%20param%C3%A9tricos%2C%20por%20eso%20estaba%20tratando%20de%20realizar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20lugar%20del%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20medidas%20repetidas.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Hab%C3%ADa%20instrucciones%20que%20dec%C3%ADan%20realizar%20un%20CMH%20en%20rangos%20para%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20jmp.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fhelp%2F14%2Fnonparametric-multiple-comparisons.shtml%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3E%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fhelp%2F14%2Fnonparametric-multiple-comparisons.shtml%3C%2FA%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Si%20esto%20es%20incorrecto%2C%20%C2%BFhay%20alguna%20manera%20de%20que%20a%C3%BAn%20pueda%20realizar%20la%20prueba%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62347%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ayuda%20para%20interpretar%20los%20resultados%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Freidman%20(Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62347%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELa%20plataforma%20de%20contingencia%20realiza%20un%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20tabulaci%C3%B3n%20cruzada.%20El%20an%C3%A1lisis%20se%20basa%20en%20conteos%2C%20no%20en%20rangos.%20Las%20pruebas%20CMH%20introducen%20una%20variable%20de%20estratificaci%C3%B3n.%20Las%20cuatro%20versiones%20de%20CMH%20dependen%20del%20tipo%20de%20modelado%20de%20las%20variables%20Y%20y%20X.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDeber%C3%ADa%20considerar%20un%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20medidas%20repetidas%20en%20su%20lugar.%20por%20favor%20mira%20esto%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fnotes%2F30%2F584.html%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3E%20nota%20tecnica%3C%2FA%3E%20para%20m%C3%A1s%20informaci%C3%B3n.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
kfr890
Level II

Help interpreting Freidman Test results (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)

Hi everyone,

 

I'm conducting a Freidman test on a dataset. The data tests the effects of a treatment and consists of 10 subjects. Each subject had their heart rate (HR) measured six times over a period of 6 hours. To conduct the test, I saved the HR ranks (ordinal) and set is as the Y in the fit Y by X, the subjects as the 'Block', and the 'Hour' as the X. This is the output of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Tests but I'm having difficulty interpreting them. Is there a significant effect eventhough the Correlation of Scores is much greater than 0.05?  Also, if the results do show there are significant changes induced by the treatement, is it appropriate to conduct a Steel-Dwass all pairs test on the nominal data as a post hoc test?

Ctest.JPG

 

Thank you for your help!

 

12 REPLIES 12
kfr890
Level II

Re: Help interpreting Freidman Test results (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)

Thank you for the explanations and help with this analysis. It is very helpful!

Re: Help interpreting Freidman Test results (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)

I see why the ranks work. I have never approached the non-parametric analysis this way.You were following the instructions correctly.

Re: Help interpreting Freidman Test results (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel)

I suggest trying the repeated measures analysis. Make sure that your data is organized as Heart Rate, Treatment, Subject, and Hour. See the A Multivariate Approach example in sample I cited.

Recommended Articles