cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates

Not sure how Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates compare to  alpha/beta estimates used in the Weibull Parameter Estimates for days to failure plots.

 

charles_revelle_1-1668625318021.png

Understand beta of >1 means in Weibull indicates the device will continue to failure over-time, is the Extreme-Value Estimates just a transform of the Weibull Analysis?

 

Thanks, 

Charles

JMP 17

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates

Mark,

 

Thanks for the info..  Went back and re-read Bill Meeker book. Think I will stick with Weibull and LogNormal for a device that "gracefully" degrades over time.  Appears Extreme Value is better for early life failures with increasing hf.

 

Thanks,

 

Charles

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates

The Weibull distribution cumulative distribution function is related to the Smallest Extreme Value distribution CDF:

 

weibull 1.PNG

(JMP Training course)

 

The SEV distribution:

 

small.PNG

(JMP Training course)

 

The Weibull CDF above can be transformed from a location-scale parameterization to a scale-shape parameterization:

 

weibull 2.PNG

(JMP Training course)

 

The interpretation of the shape parameter is specifically:

 

hazard.PNG

(JMP Training course)

 

I am not sure if this information is helpful. Continue to ask questions if it is still not clear.

Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates

Mark,

 

Thanks for the info..  Went back and re-read Bill Meeker book. Think I will stick with Weibull and LogNormal for a device that "gracefully" degrades over time.  Appears Extreme Value is better for early life failures with increasing hf.

 

Thanks,

 

Charles