- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates
Not sure how Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates compare to alpha/beta estimates used in the Weibull Parameter Estimates for days to failure plots.
Understand beta of >1 means in Weibull indicates the device will continue to failure over-time, is the Extreme-Value Estimates just a transform of the Weibull Analysis?
Thanks,
Charles
JMP 17
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates
Mark,
Thanks for the info.. Went back and re-read Bill Meeker book. Think I will stick with Weibull and LogNormal for a device that "gracefully" degrades over time. Appears Extreme Value is better for early life failures with increasing hf.
Thanks,
Charles
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates
The Weibull distribution cumulative distribution function is related to the Smallest Extreme Value distribution CDF:
(JMP Training course)
The SEV distribution:
(JMP Training course)
The Weibull CDF above can be transformed from a location-scale parameterization to a scale-shape parameterization:
(JMP Training course)
The interpretation of the shape parameter is specifically:
(JMP Training course)
I am not sure if this information is helpful. Continue to ask questions if it is still not clear.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Extreme-Value Parameter Estimates
Mark,
Thanks for the info.. Went back and re-read Bill Meeker book. Think I will stick with Weibull and LogNormal for a device that "gracefully" degrades over time. Appears Extreme Value is better for early life failures with increasing hf.
Thanks,
Charles