cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-11053%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EFreiheitsgrade%20in%20Post-hoc-T-Tests%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-11053%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CP%3EHallo%2C%20ich%20habe%20eine%20Frage%20zu%20den%20Post-hoc-T-Tests%20in%20JMP.%20Ich%20f%C3%BChre%20eine%20ANOVA%20mit%20wiederholten%20Messungen%20mit%20einem%20zuf%C3%A4lligen%20und%20zwei%20festen%20Faktoren%20aus.%20Die%20wechselseitige%20Wechselwirkung%20zwischen%20den%20festen%20Faktoren%20ist%20enthalten.%20(Y%20%3D%20zuf%C3%A4llig%20(A)%20%2B%20A%20%2B%20B%20%2B%20A%20*%20B).%20Nach%20einem%20signifikanten%20A%20*%20B-Effekt%20verwende%20ich%20die%20Option%20%22Effektdetails%22%2C%20um%20post-hoc-T-Tests%20durchzuf%C3%BChren%2C%20wobei%20Bonferroni%20die%20Anzahl%20der%20Vergleiche%20korrigiert%20hat.%20Aber.%20Wenn%20ich%20im%20t-test%20den%20'detaillierten%20Vergleich'%20w%C3%A4hlte%2C%20um%20den%20t-Wert%20und%20die%20Freiheitsgrade%20zu%20%C3%BCberpr%C3%BCfen%2C%20erhalte%20ich%20Freiheitsgrade%2C%20die%20viel%20h%C3%B6her%20sind%20als%20ich%20erwarten%20w%C3%BCrde%20und%20auch%20von%20einer%20Y-Variablen%20zur%20anderen%20variieren.%20AUCH%2C%20wenn%20ich%20f%C3%BCr%20jedes%20Y%20die%20gleiche%20Anzahl%20unabh%C3%A4ngiger%20Datenpunkte%20habe.%20Hat%20jemand%20dieses%20Problem%20und%20wei%C3%9F%2C%20wie%20die%20DFS%20f%C3%BCr%20diese%20Tests%20berechnet%20werden%3F%20Hilfe%20sehr%20gesch%C3%A4tzt!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Degrees of freedom in post-hoc t-tests

Hi, I have a question regarding the post-hoc t-tests in JMP. I run a repeated measures ANOVA with one random and two fixed factors. The two-way interaction between the fixed factors is included. (Y=random(A) + A + B + A*B). Following a significant A*B effect, I use the 'effect details' option to do post-hoc t-tests, Bonferroni-corrected for the number of comparisons. But. When I chose 'detailed comparison' in the t-test, to check the t-value and degrees of freedom, I get degrees of freedom that are a lot higher than i would expect, and that also vary from one Y variable to another, EVEN when I have the same number of independent datapoints for each Y. Has anyone run into this and knows how the dfs are calculated for these tests? Help much appreciated!

0 REPLIES 0

Recommended Articles