cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
eldad_galili
Level III

DOE constrain not working

Hi All,

 

I have JMP 16, and I want to design a DOE with the attached factors and the below constrains.

When I get the stage of the design test it ignor the constrain, without any warning messege.

Can anybody help me with this?

 

Suplier == "Finland" & ("\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n == "160" | "\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n ==
"180") & ("\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "80-20" |
"\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "60-40" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n ==
"50-50") & (Unraveling time == "105" | Unraveling time == "120") & (
Sealing material percentage == "0.5" | Sealing material percentage == "1" |
Sealing material percentage == "1.5")

 

Thanks,

Eldad

 

 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
Phil_Kay
Staff

Re: DOE constrain not working

I suspect that it is the way that you have defined your disallowed combinations with ANDs between all the conditions. I don't think that it is defining the disallowed combinations that you intended.

 

I have broken out the conditions that you have linked with ANDs into separate lines to try and make more sense of it:

 

Suplier == "Finland" 
& ("\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n == "160" | "\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n =="180") 
& ("\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "80-20" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "60-40" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "50-50") 
& (Unraveling time == "105" | Unraveling time == "120") 
& (Sealing material percentage == "0.5" | Sealing material percentage == "1" | Sealing material percentage == "1.5")

 

 

Perhaps this way of defining the disallowed combinations works better:

 

(Suplier == "Finland" 
& ("\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n == "160" | "\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n =="180"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& ("\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "80-20" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "60-40" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "50-50"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& (Unraveling time == "105" | Unraveling time == "120"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& (Sealing material percentage == "0.5" | Sealing material percentage == "1" | Sealing material percentage == "1.5"))

Here each condition is separated with an OR.

See the attached Custom Design that was created with these disallowed combinations.

I would have some concerns about how useful this experiment is because most combinations are disallowed when Suplier = Finland. But again, maybe that is not what you intended.

It might help if you can state in words the nature of the disallowed combinations that you have in your experiment.

I hope this helps,
Phil

 

 

View solution in original post

eldad_galili
Level III

Re: DOE constrain not working

Thank yoy very much, your suggestion of changing between "and" to "or" worked!!

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Phil_Kay
Staff

Re: DOE constrain not working

I suspect that it is the way that you have defined your disallowed combinations with ANDs between all the conditions. I don't think that it is defining the disallowed combinations that you intended.

 

I have broken out the conditions that you have linked with ANDs into separate lines to try and make more sense of it:

 

Suplier == "Finland" 
& ("\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n == "160" | "\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n =="180") 
& ("\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "80-20" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "60-40" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "50-50") 
& (Unraveling time == "105" | Unraveling time == "120") 
& (Sealing material percentage == "0.5" | Sealing material percentage == "1" | Sealing material percentage == "1.5")

 

 

Perhaps this way of defining the disallowed combinations works better:

 

(Suplier == "Finland" 
& ("\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n == "160" | "\!"Nazal\!" Amount"n =="180"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& ("\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "80-20" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "60-40" | "\!"Long-Short\!" fiber ratio"n == "50-50"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& (Unraveling time == "105" | Unraveling time == "120"))
|
(Suplier == "Finland"
& (Sealing material percentage == "0.5" | Sealing material percentage == "1" | Sealing material percentage == "1.5"))

Here each condition is separated with an OR.

See the attached Custom Design that was created with these disallowed combinations.

I would have some concerns about how useful this experiment is because most combinations are disallowed when Suplier = Finland. But again, maybe that is not what you intended.

It might help if you can state in words the nature of the disallowed combinations that you have in your experiment.

I hope this helps,
Phil

 

 

eldad_galili
Level III

Re: DOE constrain not working

Thank yoy very much, your suggestion of changing between "and" to "or" worked!!

Recommended Articles