cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Thierry_S
Super User

Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) exact calculation?

Hi JMP Community,

For as long as I can remember, I have used an approximation of the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR calculation to account for multiple testing:

 > On a sorted list of Nominal P Values (smaller to larger) : BH p Val = Nom P Val * N Row()/Row ()

However, I'm aware of some limitation with this approach:

  1. For large Nominal p Values, the formula described above returns values > 1 (not by much but it tells me that something is not right)
  2. For Nominal p Values that are equal (or very close for one another), the formula returns slightly different values which I think should not be the case

Hence, is there a better way to calculate the FDR?

 

Thank you for your help.

Best,

TS

 

Thierry R. Sornasse
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) exact calculation?

Hi JMP Community,

With a bit of digging, I was able to find an Add-In developed by John Sall from JMP that calculates correctly the FDR p Value False Discovery Rate PValue 

Best,

TS

Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Benjamini-Hochberg (FDR) exact calculation?

Hi JMP Community,

With a bit of digging, I was able to find an Add-In developed by John Sall from JMP that calculates correctly the FDR p Value False Discovery Rate PValue 

Best,

TS

Thierry R. Sornasse

Recommended Articles