cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Use World Cup data to build models, explore spatial relationships, and create informative visualizations in JMP. Register. July 17, 2 pm US Eastern Time.
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

New England JMP Users Group

Open to all JMP users in CT, MA, ME, NH, RI and VT
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
rexneal
Level III

Query of Response Screening

I have an interactive database of 67 gene levels in multiple specimens ~100. These genes were chosen for probable activity. Many of the genes are interactive with others. I am trying to determine the best group of genes that correlate with each individual gene. Using various platforms (predictor screening utility, boosted tree/forest in partition, response screening in modeling, and screening in modeling), I get a similar hierarchy of genes, which make biological sense. However, using response screening in fit model, I get a very different hierarchy, which makes much less biological sense. Any ideas why the response screening in fit model is so different.

Thanks, Neal

0 REPLIES 0