cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-342652%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EProfiler-Extrapolation%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-342652%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CU%3EProblem%3C%2FU%3E%20%3A%20Ich%20versuche%2C%20verschiedene%20Analysen%20in%20einer%20einzigen%20Profiler-Tabelle%20zusammenzufassen.%20Einige%20Forscher%20haben%20jedoch%20in%20ihren%20Experimenten%20unterschiedliche%20Faktorbereiche%20verwendet.%20Wenn%20ich%20die%20Profiler%20zusammen%20staple%2C%20verwendet%20JMP%20den%20gr%C3%B6%C3%9Ften%20Bereich%20in%20allen%20Datentabellen%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20Faktoreinstellungen%20unten%20im%20Profiler.%20Infolgedessen%20machen%20einige%20Analysen%20Vorhersagen%20au%C3%9Ferhalb%20der%20Grenzen%20ihrer%20jeweiligen%20Experimente%2C%20was%20zu%20fehlerhaften%20Vorhersagen%20f%C3%BChrt.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CU%3EVorschlag%3C%2FU%3E%20%3A%20Es%20w%C3%A4re%20sch%C3%B6n%2C%20wenn%20JMP%20die%20Faktorbereiche%20der%20jeweiligen%20Datens%C3%A4tze%20verstehen%20w%C3%BCrde%2C%20die%20sie%20generiert%20haben%2C%20sodass%20beim%20Kombinieren%20der%20Profiler%20eine%20Nullvorhersage%20entsteht%20oder%20der%20Bereich%20des%20Faktorraums%2C%20der%20nicht%20in%20den%20jeweiligen%20Daten%20enthalten%20war%2C%20irgendwie%20ausgegraut%20wird%20Tabelle.%20Ich%20wei%C3%9F%2C%20dass%20JMP%2016%20um%20eine%20Extrapolationswarnfunktion%20erweitert%20wird%2C%20aber%20ich%20denke%2C%20es%20w%C3%A4re%20besser%2C%20die%20Vorhersage%20entweder%20auf%20Null%20zu%20setzen%20oder%20den%20Extrapolationsraum%20auszublenden.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-342652%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EStatistik%20und%20Analytik%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-560656%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Profiler%20Extrapolation%20-%20Status%20ge%C3%A4ndert%20in%3A%20Archiviert%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-560656%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EWir%20archivieren%20diese%20Anfrage.%20Wenn%20sie%20noch%20wichtig%20ist%2C%20hinterlassen%20Sie%20bitte%20einen%20Kommentar%20mit%20weiteren%20Details%20und%20wir%20werden%20sie%20erneut%20%C3%B6ffnen.%20Vielen%20Dank!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Profiler Extrapolation

Issue: I am trying to stack together different analyses into a single profiler table. However, Some researchers have used different factor ranges in their experiments. When I stack the profilers together JMP uses the largest range across all the data tables for the factor settings on the bottom of the profiler. As a result, some analyses are making predictions outside the bounds of their respective experiments leading to erroneous predictions.

Suggestion: It would be nice if JMP understood the factor ranges of the respective data sets which generated them so that when I combined the profilers it gives a null prediction or somehow grays out that region of the factor space that wasn’t included in the respective data table. I know there is an extrapolation warning feature being added to JMP 16 but I think it would be better to either null out the prediction or gray-out that extrapolation space. 

1 Comment
Ryan_Gilmore
Community Manager
Status changed to: Archived
We are archiving this request. If this is still important please comment with additional details and we will reopen. Thank you!