cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP software.

  1. Search: Please search for an existing idea first before submitting a new idea.
  2. Submit: Post your new idea using the Suggest an Idea button. Please submit one actionable idea per post rather than a single post with multiple ideas.
  3. Kudo & Comment Kudo ideas you like, and comment to add to an idea.
  4. Subscribe: Follow the status of ideas you like. Refer to status definitions to understand where an idea is in its lifecycle. (You are automatically subscribed to ideas you've submitted or commented on.)

We consider several factors when looking for what ideas to add to JMP. This includes what will have the greatest benefit to our customers based on scope, needs and current resources. Product ideas help us decide what features to work on next. Additionally, we often look to ideas for inspiration on how to add value to developments already in our pipeline or enhancements to new or existing features.

Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Predictor Screening add random normal data and random nominal to compare in results table

What inspired this wish list request? On a couple of webinars showing the Predictor Screening, I have seen the user add some random normal data, to show where just random data might fall within the Predictor Screening output. This seems to be a great idea to always have that option, or even make it the default. 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see? Add the option on the launch dialog to add Random Normal data and/or Random Nominal data to allow comparison to just random chance from continuous or nominal predictors. Might be an option down near the "Number Trees" and "Set Random Seed", or under the "Cast Selected Columns into Roles". 

Ideally would color code in the table output to highlight "Random Normal" and "Random Nominal N". 

The random nominal may be more difficult. In the JMP sample "Bands Data", some of the predictors are 2 categories, or 3, 4, 5. So either give user the chance to specify, or maybe there is a procedure to add 2,3,4,5 if already exist in the predictors.

 

 

Why is this idea important? Ease of use and interpretation of the results. I like how p-value is color coded and sorted in many of the platform outputs, this would be similar to show about where random noise would be in the Predictor Screening results.

 

 

2 Comments
Vball247
Level V

Vball247_0-1709298760412.png

Example of adding "Random Normal", "Random 2 Categories", "Random 3 Categories", to check what predictors might be above the noise

Vball247
Level V

Vball247_0-1709298855976.png

Having to manually enter new columns or temporary columns. Wish is to have this as an option selectable on the Predictor Screening platform launch