cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-347910%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EMinimum%20split%20size%20on%20trees%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-347910%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EI'd%20like%20to%20have%20the%20ability%20for%20the%20minimum%20split%20size%20for%20tree%20models%20to%20be%20based%20upon%20a%20%25%20of%20the%20training%20sample%20size%20vs%20a%20integer%20number.%26nbsp%3B%20So%20for%20example%20I%20could%20ask%20that%20the%20minimum%20split%20size%20would%20be%2010%25%20of%20the%20training%20samples%20size%2C%20rounded%20up.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-347910%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EStatistics%20and%20Analytics%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Minimum split size on trees

I'd like to have the ability for the minimum split size for tree models to be based upon a % of the training sample size vs a integer number.  So for example I could ask that the minimum split size would be 10% of the training samples size, rounded up.