cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP software.

  1. Search: Please search for an existing idea first before submitting a new idea.
  2. Submit: Post your new idea using the Suggest an Idea button. Please submit one actionable idea per post rather than a single post with multiple ideas.
  3. Kudo & Comment Kudo ideas you like, and comment to add to an idea.
  4. Subscribe: Follow the status of ideas you like. Refer to status definitions to understand where an idea is in its lifecycle. (You are automatically subscribed to ideas you've submitted or commented on.)

We consider several factors when looking for what ideas to add to JMP. This includes what will have the greatest benefit to our customers based on scope, needs and current resources. Product ideas help us decide what features to work on next. Additionally, we often look to ideas for inspiration on how to add value to developments already in our pipeline or enhancements to new or existing features.

Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Custom formulas for summary statistics that can be created then used in Tabulate, Distribution, Summary, Graph Builder etc. as well as Column functions (ex. Col GCV(:Column 1, :By Variable Column))

What inspired this wish list request? Having to perform a task of "make combined data table" and re-creating a complex function multiple times to get the desired values.  Also, is difficult to coach scientist on how to do this with their data and there is opportunity for the formula to be modified or entered incorrectly by mistake.

 

What is the improvement you would like to see? Custom formulas for summary statistics that can be created then used in Tabulate, Distribution, Summary, Graph Builder etc. It would be great if you could also use any of these formulas as column formulas with the option of By Variables.(ex. Col GCV(:Column 1, :By Variable Column))

 

 

Why is this idea important? 

Increase efficiency; Avoid errors when re-entering formulas; Allow flexibility to add to the COTS based on need.

 

 

 

5 Comments
DIVIDESbyZER0
Level III

My original post was overwritten with an autosave version.  Will update now.

Status changed to: Acknowledged

Hi @DIVIDESbyZER0, thank you for your suggestion! We have captured your request and will take it under consideration.

ehchandlerjr
Level V

I would like to second this, if adding comments mean anything.

jthi
Super User

I have also mentioned something similar to JMP during JMP17 EA in May 2022 as a feedback. I have also mentioned later multiple times to different JMP staff. I would also think that this wishAdd normalization and robust statistical functions (and matrix functions) to be partially related as hopefully we could just implement those ourselves and not wait for JMP. 

 

 

hogi
Level XI

Really bad that every statistics platform has its own - surprisingly restricted - set of statistics functions

 

A: Summary Statistics

hogi_0-1721281299545.png

 

B: Graph Builder

hogi_2-1721281420144.png

 

c: Header Statistics:

hogi_3-1721281491506.png


worst: New Formula Column

hogi_1-1721281338994.png

 

Why is this not harmonized - why are so many statistics missing ?!?!

 

Difficult to provide ANY statistics possible.
As an alternative:
The ability to add missing entries via user defined statistics could easily solve the issue by providing the user the possibility to fill the gap.


Sounds related to : Option or function to evaluate a custom column formula at once, or cache values between rows ?

or https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Column-reference-in-custom-function/m-p/265085/highlight/tr... 

For Transform Functions, I asked JMP support why it's not possible to create user defined statistics.
And the answer was (TS-00063463):

hogi_4-1721282145327.png

"rare use cases" !

Even from the comparison of the different statistics platforms one can deduce that for some of the platforms MOST of the statistics options are missing, not just the rare one.