cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP Security Notice: CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619

    JMP promptly initiated a review of its products, services, and relevant infrastructure for exposure to CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619.

    Our assessment of JMP products has not identified exposure to these vulnerabilities. Where remediation was required within supporting environments, appropriate security updates and controls have been applied and validated.

    We have identified no evidence of successful exploitation or unauthorized access to JMP systems or customer information associated with these vulnerabilities.

    JMP continues to monitor the issue and relevant vendor guidance. No action is required by JMP customers at this time.

  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Graph Builder Toolbar streamlines interactive graphing. Creates shortcuts on Report and GraphBuilder Helpers toolbars. Download and install the extension.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Compare data tables function

We miss one useful function for comparison all columns of two data tables in JMP16.

Compare_data_tables.png

 

 

 

This helpful function was available in JMP15 to find easily unmatched columns (name changes of columns, additional columns and missing columns). Result was available in two seconds independent of number of columns. In JMP16 we have to manually scroll through all columns to determine if there are linked or unlinked (match). That`s why it takes more time dependent on number of columns and has a high risk to overlook differences.

Is there a chance to get this function back in JMP16?

2 Comments
Sarah-Sylvestre
Level V
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Hi @bdr_data_team, thank you for your suggestion! We have captured your request and will take it under consideration.

datadad
Level III

I was going to post this as a wish list item too. In JMP 16, when the columns differ, but the matching ones do not, the message back is "There is no difference in the data." This is very misleading and has resulted in us missing changes. The column matcher widget is not sufficient because the lines connecting columns can be complex and cannot even be seen for typical data sets (>20 columns say).