cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-384420%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EAggiungi%20VIF%20alla%20diagnostica%20DOE%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-384420%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EAttualmente%2C%20vediamo%20i%20VIF%20solo%20dopo%20aver%20utilizzato%20il%20pulsante%20Crea%20tabella%20e%20simulato%20una%20risposta%2C%20quindi%20esaminando%20l'output%20di%20Adatta%20modello%2C%20supponendo%20che%20gli%20utenti%20abbiano%20aggiunto%20l'opzione%20VIF%20alle%20Preferenze%20o%20altri%20mezzi%20per%20rivelarli.Ma%20i%20VIF%20sono%20diagnostica%20di%20progetto%20e%20come%20tali%20dovrebbero%20apparire%20nella%20sezione%20diagnostica%20di%20progetto.Apportare%20questa%20modifica%20o%20aggiunta%20velocizzer%C3%A0%20la%20generazione%20del%20progetto%20utente%2C%20specialmente%20per%20i%20modelli%20di%20secondo%20ordine%20e%20di%20ordine%20superiore.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-384420%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EStatistiche%20e%20analisi%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Add VIFs to DOE diagnostics

Currently, we see VIFs only after using the Make Table button and simulating a response, then examining Fit Model output, assuming users have added the VIF option to Preferences or other means of revealing them.  But VIFs are design diagnostics, and as such should appear in the design diagnostics section.  Making this change or addition will speed user design generation especially for second and higher order models.

1 Comment
jszarka
Level V

This is what I saw as JMP's take on this in the past -- Include VIF in Evaluate Design