User Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Image to Table JMP extension imports single or batch images as data tables. Useful to extract curves from pictures or convert image data to curve data to use in analyses like Functional Data Explorer. Download and install the extension.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Mickyboy
Mickyboy
Level V

Variable confounds with residual

Created: Mar 8, 2021 10:05 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 8, 2023 5:30 PM (9408 views)

Hi,

 

l am attempting to analyse data for an interlab study with a mixed model, its a nested design with 5 variables, the dependant variable is titers, the structure of my analysis is as follows

Fixed Effect

Sample (30 of)

Random Effects

Sample*Lab (3 levels)
Sample*Day (3 Levels)
Sample*Run (2 Levels)
Replicate[Sample,Lab,Day,Run] (replicate has 2 levels)
Sample*Lab*Day

 

l get the error message that Replicate[Sample,Lab,Day,Run] confounds with residual, this is the first time i have encountered this message and i am not sure what its telling me, has anyone encountered this before and how did they overcome it??

 

Thanks

Mick

 

 

0 Kudos
10 REPLIES 10
Mark_Bailey
Staff Mark_Bailey
Staff

Re: Variable confounds with residual

Mar 11, 2021 06:59 AM (1304 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Mickyboy 03-10-2021

Sample as you define and use it is a FIXED effect on the response.

 

Again, include the main effects to address the primary questions. You may include cross-terms to estimate and test interaction effects if you suspect that the effect of the other factors change from one sample to another. Is that a reasonable expectation? Is there precedent for it? Or can it be ruled out a priori?

Recommended Articles