cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ETOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHallo%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIch%20analysiere%20historische%20Daten%20und%20muss%20aussagekr%C3%A4ftige%20%C3%84quivalenzakzeptanzkriterien%20zwischen%20Gruppen%20finden%20und%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20ein%20neues%20Experiment%20berechnen.%20Wie%20kann%20ich%20Akzeptanzkriterien%20f%C3%BCr%20praktische%20%C3%84quivalenz%20festlegen%20und%20verwende%20den%20DOE-Rechner%20f%C3%BCr%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20und%20K-Werte%3F%20Welche%20prospektiven%20Mittel%20soll%20ich%20eingeben.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDanke%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-90274%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-90274%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EW%C3%A4hlen%20Sie%20Analysieren%20%26gt%3B%20Y%20an%20X%20anpassen.%20Geben%20Sie%20die%20Messung%20in%20der%20Y-Rolle%20und%20den%20Gruppierungsindikator%20in%20der%20X-Rolle%20ein.%20OK%20klicken.%20Klicken%20Sie%20auf%20das%20rote%20Dreieck%20und%20w%C3%A4hlen%20Sie%20%C3%84quivalenztest.%20Geben%20Sie%20den%20praktischen%20Unterschied%20ein%20und%20klicken%20Sie%20auf%20OK.%20Dieses%20Ergebnis%20erscheint%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20561px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20561px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20561px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F15006iC31929292CAD5DD6%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWeitere%20Details%20und%20Beispiele%20finden%20Sie%20unter%20Hilfe%20%26gt%3B%20B%C3%BCcher%20%26gt%3B%20Grundlegende%20Analyse.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-87671%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-87671%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIch%20habe%20die%20gestellte%20Frage%20vollkommen%20verstanden%20%E2%80%93%20historische%20Daten%20mit%20neuen%20Daten%20f%C3%BCr%20den%20%C3%84quivalenztest%20zu%20vergleichen.%20Ich%20glaube%2C%20die%20empfohlene%20Methode%20%C3%BCber%20die%20DOE-Route%20war%20zumindest%20meines%20Wissens%20etwas%20unklar.%20Ich%20habe%20die%20%C3%A4hnliche%20Frage%20auch%20gestellt%20...%20Wir%20m%C3%BCssen%20TOST%20f%C3%BCr%20zwei%20Bev%C3%B6lkerungsgruppen%20verwenden%20und%20m%C3%B6chten%20eine%20grafische%20Pr%C3%A4sentation%20f%C3%BCr%20das%20regul%C3%A4re%20Publikum%20haben.%20JMP%20verf%C3%BCgt%20m%C3%B6glicherweise%20nicht%20%C3%BCber%20eine%20einfache%20M%C3%B6glichkeit%2C%20dies%20zu%20tun%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-47384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-47384%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIch%20denke%20nicht%2C%20dass%20irgendjemand%20die%20Methode%2C%20die%20ich%20zuletzt%20gezeigt%20habe%2C%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20Test%20mit%20zwei%20Stichproben%20verwenden%20sollte.%20Dieses%20Ergebnis%20bezieht%20sich%20auf%20die%20hypothetische%20Differenz%2C%20nicht%20auf%20die%20%C3%84quivalenz.%20MINITAB%20und%20Ihre%20Handberechnung%20liefern%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20eine%20Grundgesamtheit%20unter%20der%20Annahme%20eines%20ausgewogenen%20Designs.%20Ich%20habe%20die%20Berechnung%20als%20JMP-Skript%20implementiert%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CPRE%3E%3CCODE%20class%3D%22%20language-jsl%22%3Ealpha%20%3D%200.05%3B%0Abeta%20%3D%201%20-%200.95%3B%0Adelta%20%3D%2010%3B%0Asigma%20%3D%209.43%3B%0Aratio%20%3D%201%3B%0A%0Az%20alpha%20%3D%20normal%20quantile(%201%20-%20alpha%20)%3B%0Az%20beta%20%20%3D%20normal%20quantile(%201%20-%20beta%20%20)%3B%0A%0An%20%3D%20Ceiling(%20((1%20%2B%201%2Fratio)%20*%20sigma%5E2%20*%20(z%20alpha%20%2B%20z%20beta)%5E2)%20%2F%20(delta%5E2)%20)%3B%3C%2FCODE%3E%3C%2FPRE%3E%0A%3CP%3EF%C3%BCr%20diesen%20Fall%20mit%2095%20%25%20Konfidenz%2C%2095%20%25%20Trennsch%C3%A4rfe%2C%20einer%20Standardabweichung%20von%209%2C43%20und%20einer%20signifikanten%20Differenz%20von%2010%20erhalte%20ich%20N1%20%3D%20N2%20%3D%2020.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDas%20Ergebnis%20gilt%20f%C3%BCr%20eine%20Probe.%20Die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20andere%20Grundgesamtheit%20ist%20das%20Verh%C3%A4ltnis%20multipliziert%20mit%20der%20ersten%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe.%20Das%20Verh%C3%A4ltnis%20betr%C3%A4gt%201%20f%C3%BCr%20ein%20ausgewogenes%20Design.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-47288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-47288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIch%20versuche%2C%20einen%20zweiseitigen%20%C3%84quivalenztest%20durchzuf%C3%BChren.Als%20ich%20es%20durch%20Minitab%20laufen%20lie%C3%9F%2C%20bekam%20ich%2024.Ich%20habe%20auch%20die%20folgende%20Formel%20%3D%20(2*((-1%2C96%20-1%2C6449)%5E2)*9%2C43%5E2%20)%2F10%5E2%20in%20Excel%20verwendet%20und%2023%2C11%20erhalten.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBitte%20teilen%20Sie%20mir%20mit%2C%20wie%20ich%20dies%20von%20JMP%20erhalten%20kann.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-47287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-47287%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E***%20HINWEIS%201%3A%20Ich%20habe%20meine%20urspr%C3%BCngliche%20Antwort%20aktualisiert%2C%20da%20sie%20das%20Problem%20nicht%20angesprochen%20hat%3CSTRONG%3E%20zwei%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Stichprobenpr%C3%BCfung%20auf%20Gleichwertigkeit.%20***%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E***%20HINWEIS%202%3A%20Diese%20Methode%20gilt%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20hypothetischen%20Unterschied.%20Es%20sollte%3CSTRONG%3E%20NICHT%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20zur%20Berechnung%20der%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20%C3%84quivalenz%20verwendet%20werden.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIch%20glaube%2C%20dass%20Sie%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20TOST%20der%20%C3%84quivalenz%20genauso%20bestimmen%20wie%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20Mittelwerttest%20mit%20zwei%20Stichproben.%20Ich%20habe%20das%20Papier%20nicht%20zur%20Hand%20(es%20ist%20ein%20altes)%2C%20aber%20wir%20haben%20hier%20Gl%C3%BCck%20und%20es%20sind%20die%20gleichen.%20W%C3%A4hlen%3CSTRONG%3E%20DAMHIRSCHKUH%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Design-Diagnose%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20und%20Leistung%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20.%20Klicken%3CSTRONG%3E%20Mittelwert%20aus%20zwei%20Stichproben%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Geben%20Sie%20Ihre%20Werte%20wie%20unten%20gezeigt%20ein%20und%20klicken%20Sie%20dann%3CSTRONG%3E%20Weitermachen%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20um%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20zu%20erhalten%20(in%20diesem%20Fall%2049%20bzw.%2025%20f%C3%BCr%20jede%20Gruppe).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20352px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20352px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20352px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F8340i36C987F3C44685DB%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22Capture.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIch%20werde%20weiter%20nachforschen%2C%20wenn%20ich%20Gelegenheit%20habe%2C%20herauszufinden%2C%20ob%20es%20einen%20anderen%20Weg%20gibt%20oder%20ob%20ich%20mich%20geirrt%20habe%2C%20dass%20Sie%20diese%20Methode%20verwenden%20k%C3%B6nnen.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-47278%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-47278%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIch%20m%C3%B6chte%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20%C3%84quivalenztest%20mit%20zwei%20Stichproben%20bestimmen.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIch%20m%C3%B6chte%2C%20dass%20Alpha%20und%20Beta%200%2C05%20betragen.Ein%20praktischer%20Unterschied%20ist%20%26lt%3B-10%20oder%20%26gt%3B10.%20Meine%20Standardabweichung%20betr%C3%A4gt%209%2C43.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWie%20w%C3%BCrde%20ich%20dies%20mit%20der%20Teststichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20von%20einer%20Stichprobe%20in%20jmp%20einrichten%3FK%C3%B6nnten%20Sie%20bitte%20genau%20angeben%2C%20was%20ich%20in%20jedes%20Feld%20eingeben%20soll%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38304%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38304%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EGenau!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38299%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38299%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EOk%20vielen%20Dank%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EDAMHIRSCHKUH%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Design-Diagnose%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20und%20Leistung%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Ein%20Stichprobenmittelwert%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Ich%20werde%20auch%20nach%20dem%20Std-Entwickler%20gefragt.%20Stammt%20das%20aus%20historischen%20Daten%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38298%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38298%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ENat%C3%BCrlich%20k%C3%B6nnen%20Sie%20f%C3%BCr%20diesen%20Test%20strengere%20Kriterien%20festlegen.%20Dieser%20Aspekt%20des%20TOST%20ist%20jedoch%20keine%20statistische%20Angelegenheit%2C%20es%20sei%20denn%2C%20Sie%20meinen%20mit%20%E2%80%9Estrenger%E2%80%9C%2C%20dass%20Sie%20eine%20h%C3%B6here%20Signifikanz%20(niedrigeres%20Alpha-Niveau)%20im%20Test%20erfordern.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDie%20Verteilung%20der%20historischen%20Daten%20bezieht%20sich%20auf%20einzelne%20Ergebnisse.%20Der%20TOST%20ist%20ein%20Test%20des%20Mittelwerts%20der%20Grundgesamtheit.%20Die%20historischen%20Daten%20k%C3%B6nnten%20zur%20Sch%C3%A4tzung%20des%20Mittelwerts%20und%20der%20Standardabweichung%20verwendet%20werden.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EVerwenden%3CSTRONG%3E%20DAMHIRSCHKUH%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Design-Diagnose%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20und%20Leistung%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%20Ein%20Stichprobenmittelwert%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20.%20Es%20stellt%20sich%20heraus%2C%20dass%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20dieselbe%20ist%20wie%20bei%20TOST.%20Die%20zu%20erkennende%20Differenz%20ist%20die%20Differenz%20zwischen%20dem%20Mittelwert%20und%20der%20Kriteriengrenze.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESie%20haben%20Vorgaben%2C%20die%20Sie%20f%C3%BCr%20Ihre%20neuen%20Kriterien%20nutzen%20k%C3%B6nnen.%20Sie%20k%C3%B6nnten%20einen%20angemessenen%20Sicherheitsspielraum%20festlegen.%20Wenn%20ich%20beispielsweise%20in%20meinem%20obigen%20Beispiel%20eine%20Marge%20von%2050%20%25%20m%C3%B6chte%2C%20w%C3%BCrde%20ich%20meine%20Kriterien%20auf%20y%20%26gt%3B%209%2C95%20und%20y%20%26lt%3B%2010%2C05%20festlegen.%20Sie%20ben%C3%B6tigen%20nicht%20die%20Verteilung%20historischer%20Daten%2C%20um%20die%20Kriterien%20festzulegen.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38296%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38296%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EDanke%20sch%C3%B6n%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIch%20habe%20historische%20Werte%20und%20alle%20liegen%20innerhalb%20der%20Spezifikation%2C%20aber%20ich%20m%C3%B6chte%20die%20Akzeptanzkriterien%20f%C3%BCr%20die%20Gleichwertigkeit%20strenger%20festlegen%20als%20die%20Spezifikationen%2C%20um%20anhand%20von%20Beispielen%20zu%20zeigen%2C%20dass%20zwei%20Chargen%20praktisch%20gleichwertig%20sind.%20Kann%20ich%20strenge%20%C3%84quivalenzakzeptanzkriterien%20festlegen%2C%20indem%20ich%20eine%20Regel%20auf%20der%20Grundlage%20der%20Verteilung%20historischer%20Daten%20festlege%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAu%C3%9Ferdem%20muss%20ich%20die%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%20f%C3%BCr%20den%20Test%20im%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fenrechner%20festlegen%20(K%C3%B6nnte%20ich%20den%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fenrechner%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20T-Test%20verwenden%20und%20welche%20prospektiven%20Mittelwerte%20gebe%20ich%20in%20den%20Rechner%20ein)%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-38294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20TOST-Akzeptanzkriterien%20und%20Stichprobengr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-38294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EDie%20praktisch%20%C3%A4quivalenten%20Akzeptanzkriterien%20sind%20keine%20statistischen%20Vertrauensgrenzen%20oder%20-grenzen.%20Sie%20basieren%20wie%20Spezifikationen%20auf%20inakzeptablen%20Leistungs-%20oder%20Ausfallkriterien.%20Sie%20k%C3%B6nnen%20beispielsweise%20festlegen%2C%20dass%20ein%20bestimmtes%20Attribut%20des%20Materials%2C%20Teils%20oder%20Ger%C3%A4ts%20innerhalb%20von%200%2C1%20von%2010%20liegen%20muss%2C%20da%20es%20andernfalls%20nicht%20die%20angegebene%20Leistung%20erbringt.%20Die%20praktisch%20%C3%A4quivalenten%20Akzeptanzkriterien%20sind%20in%20diesem%20Fall%20y%20%26gt%3B%209%2C9%20und%20y%20%26lt%3B%2010%2C1.%20Die%20Antwort%20auf%20Ihre%20Frage%20lautet%20also%2C%20dass%20sie%20aus%20Spezifikationen%20stammen.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDer%20von%20Ihnen%20erw%C3%A4hnte%20%C3%84quivalenztest%20(TOST)%20ist%20ein%20Paar%20Hypothesentests%2C%20bei%20denen%20die%20Akzeptanzkriterien%20die%20Null%20definieren.%20Hypothese%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EH0%3A%20Mittelwert%20%26lt%3B%209%2C9%20oder%20Mittelwert%20%26gt%3B%2010%2C1%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Pops
Level I

TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size

Hello,

I'm analyzing historical data and need to find meaningful equivalence acceptance criteria between groups and calculate sample size for a new experiments. How can I set Practically equivalence acceptance criteria and I'm using the DOE Sample Size and Power calculator K means. Which prospective means should I enter.

Thank You

11 REPLIES 11
elu
elu
Level I

Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size

I totally got the question that was asked - to compare historical data with new data for equivalence test. I believe the recommended method through DOE route was somewhat not clear at least to my knowledge. I have asked the similar question also.... We have to use TOST for 2 populations and we would like to have a graphical presentation for regular audience. JMP may not have an easy way to do that?

Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size

Select Analyze > Fit Y by X. Enter the measurement in the Y role and the grouiping indicator in the X role. Click OK. Click the red triangle and select Equivalence Test. Enter the practical difference and click OK. This result appears:

 

Capture.PNG

 

See Help > Books > Basic Analysis for more details and examples.

Recommended Articles