cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8635%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EProgettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%3A%20progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8635%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CP%3ECiao%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESto%20cercando%20di%20creare%20progetti%20di%20superfici%20di%20risposta%20per%205%20fattori.%20Stavo%20pensando%20di%20utilizzare%20CCD-Faced%20ma%20ho%20un%20dubbio%20sul%20design%20da%20scegliere%20tra%20le%20opzioni.%20Introduco%20il%20numero%20di%20fattori%20e%20quando%20devo%20scegliere%20il%20disegno%2C%20ci%20sono%20due%20opzioni%20per%20%22Central%20Composite%20Design%22%20con%20un%20diverso%20numero%20di%20corse%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E1)%20Numero%20di%20corse%3A%2028%2C%20Dimensione%20blocco%3A%20-%2C%20Punti%20centrali%3A%202.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E2)%20Numero%20di%20corse%3A%2044%2C%20Dimensione%20blocco%3A%20-%2C%20Punti%20centrali%3A%202.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(vedi%20immagine%20allegata)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQualcuno%20conosce%20la%20differenza%20tra%20queste%20due%20opzioni%20per%20il%20Central%20Composite%20Design%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Egrazie%20in%20anticipo%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESaluti%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-50670%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-50670%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20per%20il%20contributo.%20Capisco%20che%20il%20CCD%20potrebbe%20non%20essere%20un'idea%20perfetta.%20Ma%20che%20dire%20di%20t%3CSPAN%3E%20considerare%20le%20variabili%20categoriali%20come%20blocchi.%20Avr%C3%B2%2013%20esperimenti%20con%20le%202%20variabili%20continue%20e%20poi%20questi%2013%20esperimenti%20saranno%20raddoppiati%20a%20causa%20dei%20due%20livelli%20del%20fattore%20categorico.%20Non%20ho%20problemi%20con%2026%20corse.%20Durante%20l'analisi%2C%20otterr%C3%B2%20due%20diverse%20equazioni%20che%20rappresentano%20ciascuna%20variabile%20categoriale.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EApprezzo%20le%20tue%20idee.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-50368%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-50368%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESe%20interpreto%20la%20tua%20spiegazione%2C%20hai%20un%20CCD%20con%2026%20esecuzioni%20per%20due%20fattori%20continui%20e%20un%20fattore%20categoriale%20con%20due%20livelli.%20Non%20sono%20a%20conoscenza%20di%20questo%20disegno.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESi%20intende%20modellare%20la%20risposta%20separatamente%20per%20ciascun%20livello%20del%20fattore%20categoriale.%20Perch%C3%A9%20non%20utilizzare%20un%20unico%20modello%20con%20effetti%20di%20interazione%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIn%20questo%20caso%20non%20dovresti%20usare%20il%20CCD.%20%C3%88%20inteso%2C%20come%20tutti%20i%20classici%20progetti%20RSM%2C%20solo%20per%20fattori%20continui.%20Inoltre%2C%20si%20tratta%20di%20un%20design%20di%20grandi%20dimensioni%20che%20non%20%C3%A8%20efficiente%20quanto%20il%20design%20personalizzato%20I-optimal%20della%20stessa%20dimensione.%20La%20dimensione%20del%20CCD%20%C3%A8%20dettata%20dal%20metodo%20di%20progettazione%20(composizione)%2C%20dal%20numero%20di%20parametri%20nel%20modello%20quadratico%20completo%20e%20dalle%20propriet%C3%A0%20selezionate%20(ortogonale%2C%20ruotabile).%20Progettare%20su%20misura%20qualsiasi%20combinazione%20di%20tipi%20di%20fattori%2C%20qualsiasi%20combinazione%20di%20termini%20del%20modello%20e%20I-ottimalit%C3%A0.%20Il%20numero%20di%20corse%20dipende%20da%20te%20come%20ritieni%20necessario.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-50350%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-50350%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20Louv%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEseguir%C3%B2%20un'ottimizzazione%20centrale%20del%20progetto%20composito%20con%20tre%20fattori%3A%20due%20continui%20e%20uno%20categorico%20(con%202%20livelli).%20Mi%20chiedo%20se%20esiste%20uno%20studio%20di%20ricerca%20pubblicato%20con%20un%20design%20simile.%20Minitab%20mi%20sta%20dando%2026%20corse.%20L'equazione%20di%20ottimizzazione%20della%20risposta%20%C3%A8%20data%20in%20due%20sottoequazioni%20ciascuna%20relativa%20ai%202%20livelli%20della%20variabile%20categoriale.%20Come%20questo%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECateg.%20Var.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20PDI%20alto%20%3D%20%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPDI%20basso%20%3D%20%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENon%20sono%20sicuro%20di%20come%20riportare%20i%20dati%20o%20se%20sono%20sulla%20strada%20giusta.%20Un%20articolo%20simile%20pu%C3%B2%20davvero%20aiutare%20me%20o%20le%20idee%20tue%20e%20di%20altri%20amici%20su%20come%20riportare%20i%20dati%20sono%20apprezzate.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8642%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8642%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ENessun%20problema.%20Sono%20felice%20che%20tu%20l'abbia%20trovato%20utile%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELou%20V%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8641%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8641%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20LouV%20per%20la%20risposta%2C%20%C3%A8%20stata%20molto%20utile.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8640%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8640%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%20class%3D%22N3heading%20H4%22%20style%3D%22margin%3A%200%200%20-2px%3B%20padding%3A%204px%200%3B%20color%3A%20%23007cba%3B%20font-weight%3A%20bold%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20font-family%3A%20Helvetica%2C%20'Arial%20Unicode%20MS'%2C%20Arial%2C%20Verdana%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20sans-serif%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22command%22%3EFrazione%20della%20trama%20dello%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%20class%3D%22N3heading%20H4%22%20style%3D%22margin%3A%200%200%20-2px%3B%20padding%3A%204px%200%3B%20color%3A%20%23007cba%3B%20font-weight%3A%20bold%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20font-family%3A%20Helvetica%2C%20'Arial%20Unicode%20MS'%2C%20Arial%2C%20Verdana%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20sans-serif%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22command%22%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22color%3A%20%23222222%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20line-height%3A%201.5em%3B%22%3EIl%20grafico%20della%20frazione%20dello%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%20mostra%20quanta%20parte%20della%20varianza%20della%20previsione%20del%20modello%20si%20trova%20al%20di%20sopra%20(o%20al%20di%20sotto)%20di%20un%20determinato%20valore.%20Vedere%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fhelp%2FThe_Evaluate_Design_Report.shtml%23128086%22%20style%3D%22color%3A%20%230072cf%3B%20text-decoration%3A%20underline%3B%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20Frazione%20della%20trama%20dello%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%3C%2FA%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22color%3A%20%23222222%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20line-height%3A%201.5em%3B%22%3E%20.%20Ci%C3%B2%20%C3%A8%20particolarmente%20utile%20quando%20sono%20presenti%20pi%C3%B9%20fattori.%20Riepiloga%20la%20varianza%20della%20previsione%2C%20mostrando%20lo%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%20frazionario%20per%20tutti%20i%20fattori%20presi%20insieme.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%20class%3D%22N3heading%20H4%22%20style%3D%22margin%3A%200%200%20-2px%3B%20padding%3A%204px%200%3B%20color%3A%20%23007cba%3B%20font-weight%3A%20bold%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20font-family%3A%20Helvetica%2C%20'Arial%20Unicode%20MS'%2C%20Arial%2C%20Verdana%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20sans-serif%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22color%3A%20black%3B%20font-style%3A%20italic%3B%20line-height%3A%201.5em%3B%22%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%20class%3D%22N3heading%20H4%22%20style%3D%22margin%3A%200%200%20-2px%3B%20padding%3A%204px%200%3B%20color%3A%20%23007cba%3B%20font-weight%3A%20bold%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20font-family%3A%20Helvetica%2C%20'Arial%20Unicode%20MS'%2C%20Arial%2C%20Verdana%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20sans-serif%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22color%3A%20black%3B%20font-style%3A%20italic%3B%20line-height%3A%201.5em%3B%22%3EFrazione%20della%20trama%20dello%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%20class%3D%22N3heading%20H4%22%20style%3D%22margin%3A%200%200%20-2px%3B%20padding%3A%204px%200%3B%20color%3A%20%23007cba%3B%20font-weight%3A%20bold%3B%20font-size%3A%200.9em%3B%20font-family%3A%20Helvetica%2C%20'Arial%20Unicode%20MS'%2C%20Arial%2C%20Verdana%2C%20Tahoma%2C%20sans-serif%3B%22%3E%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22%22%20class%3D%22Default%20jive-image%22%20height%3D%22167%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fhelp%2Fimages%2FFDS.gif%22%20style%3D%22border%3A%200px%3B%22%20width%3D%22218%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EPuoi%20interpretare%20il%20grafico%20nella%20tua%20risposta%20ad%20ajanda%3FGrazie.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8638%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8638%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECerchiamo%20di%20rendere%20disponibili%20tutte%20le%20funzionalit%C3%A0.%20Sono%20d'accordo%20sul%20fatto%20che%20il%20progettista%20personalizzato%20fornisce%20allo%20sperimentatore%20la%20massima%20flessibilit%C3%A0%20per%20affrontare%20qualsiasi%20tipo%20di%20sfida%20di%20progettazione%20inclusi%20vincoli%2C%20fattori%20categorici%20a%20pi%C3%B9%20livelli%2C%20fattori%20di%20miscela%2C%20fattori%20numerici%20discreti%20e%20continui.%20Riteniamo%20che%20l'approccio%20auspicabile%20sia%20quello%20di%20adattare%20il%20giusto%20progetto%20a%20un%20dato%20problema%20piuttosto%20che%20adattare%20il%20problema%20a%20un%20progetto%20prescritto.%20Detto%20questo%2C%20ci%20sono%20momenti%20in%20cui%20le%20persone%20hanno%20investito%20molto%20nella%20formazione%20nell'approccio%20DOE%20classico%20e%20i%20metodi%20di%20progettazione%20pi%C3%B9%20recenti%20non%20sono%20nella%20loro%20zona%20di%20comfort.%20Inoltre%2C%20nella%20loro%20esitazione%20pesa%20anche%20la%20cosiddetta%20%22paura%20dell'aliasing%20complesso%22.%20Un%20altro%20commento%20sarebbe%20%22facciamo%20i%20nostri%20progetti%20in%20questo%20modo%20da%20anni%22%20e%20per%20noi%20si%20sono%20comportati%20bene%2C%20quindi%20%22se%20non%20%C3%A8%20rotto%20non%20aggiustarlo%22.%20Questi%20sono%20solo%20alcuni%20degli%20ostacoli%20all%E2%80%99adozione%20secondo%20me.%20Il%20motivo%20per%20cui%20la%20mia%20risposta%20includeva%20la%20progettazione%20offerta%20utilizzando%20il%20designer%20personalizzato%2C%20sebbene%20ci%C3%B2%20non%20facesse%20parte%20della%20domanda%2C%20era%20per%20suggerire%20che%20se%20avessi%20risorse%20limitate%20e%20volessi%20scegliere%20un%20esperimento%20con%20il%20maggior%20numero%20di%20esecuzioni%2C%20avrei%20esaminato%20tutte%20le%20opzioni%20prima%20della%20sperimentazione%20poich%C3%A9%20il%20costo%20in%20questione%20%C3%A8%20fortemente%20gravato%20sul%20lato%20della%20sperimentazione%20e%20non%20sulla%20fase%20di%20impostazione%20del%20DOE.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8637%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8637%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EC'%C3%A8%20un%20motivo%20per%20cui%20qualcuno%20vorrebbe%20NON%20utilizzare%20la%20funzionalit%C3%A0%20di%20progettazione%20personalizzata%20in%20JMP%3F%20Non%20riesco%20a%20vedere%20il%20vantaggio%20di%20utilizzare%20questi%20vecchi%20design%20%22classici%22%20e%20mi%20chiedo%20se%20mi%20sto%20perdendo%20qualcosa.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EFino%20all'invenzione%20del%20disegno%20di%20screening%20definitivo%20(DSD)%2C%20un%20paio%20di%20anni%20fa%2C%20ho%20praticamente%20sempre%20utilizzato%20la%20funzionalit%C3%A0%20di%20progettazione%20personalizzata%20(che%20a%20volte%20veniva%20impostata%20per%20impostazione%20predefinita%20su%20un%20disegno%20classico)%20per%20il%20mio%20lavoro.%20Ora%20utilizzo%20DSD%20per%20un%20sacco%20di%20lavoro%20esplorativo%20e%20per%20la%20progettazione%20personalizzata%20per%20creare%20progetti%20ottimali%20per%20affinare%20i%20dettagli.%20Sebbene%20JMP%20ci%20offra%20tutti%20quei%20progetti%20pi%C3%B9%20vecchi%2C%20non%20sono%20riuscito%20a%20capire%20perch%C3%A9%20l'utilizzo%20del%20design%20personalizzato%20e%20del%20DSD%20non%20abbia%20reso%20obsoleti%20i%20progetti%20classici%20essenzialmente%20in%20tutti%20i%20casi.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESarei%20molto%20interessato%20a%20sentire%20altri%20pensieri%20su%20questo%20punto.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-8636%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20Progettazione%20della%20superficie%20di%20risposta%20-%20Progettazione%20composita%20centrale%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-8636%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ELa%20differenza%20tra%20i%20due%20disegni%20che%20hai%20trovato%20nella%20Tabella%20dei%20disegni%20%C3%A8%20che%20il%20primo%20disegno%20a%2028%20sequenze%20%C3%A8%20in%20realt%C3%A0%20una%20risoluzione%20V%2C%20un%20fattoriale%20frazionario%20a%2016%20sequenze%20insieme%20a%202X5%20%3D%2010%2C%20punti%20assiali%20e%202%20punti%20centrali%20per%20un%20totale%20di%2028%20corre.%20Il%20disegno%20a%2044%20corse%20sarebbe%20il%20disegno%20fattoriale%20completo%20a%2032%20corse%20pi%C3%B9%202X5%20%3D%2010%20punti%20assiali%20e%202%20punti%20centrali%20per%20un%20totale%20di%2044%20corse.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDi%20seguito%20%C3%A8%20mostrata%20una%20frazione%20del%20grafico%20dello%20spazio%20di%20progettazione%20per%20illustrare%20la%20varianza%20del%20CCD%20a%2028%20corse%20(ROSSO)%20rispetto%20al%20CCD%20a%2044%20corse%20(VERDE)%20rispetto%20a%20un%20progetto%20RSM%20generato%20utilizzando%20Custom%20Designer%20per%2044%20corse%20(BLU).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%226802_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%209.36.00%20AM.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20421px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%226802_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%209.36.00%20AM.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%226802_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%209.36.00%20AM.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F577iEAA1EBAE8FC61434%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%226802_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%209.36.00%20AM.png%22%20alt%3D%226802_Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%209.36.00%20AM.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
ajanda
Level I

Response Surface Design - Central Composite Design

Hi there,

I am trying to build a Response surface Designs for 5 factors. I was thinking to use CCD-Faced but I have a doubt on the design to choose from the options. I introduce the number of factors and when I have to choose the design, there are two option for "Central Composite Design" with different number of Runs:

1) Number of Runs: 28, Block size: -, Center Points: 2.

2) Number of Runs: 44, Block size: -, Center Points: 2.

(see attached image)

Does anyone know the difference between this two options for Central Composite Design?

Thank you in advance

Regards,

10 REPLIES 10
louv
Staff (Retired)

Re: Response Surface Design - Central Composite Design

No problem. I am glad that you found it helpful

Lou V

Recommended Articles