cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Least squares regression - removing insignificant terms quickly?

Hi all-

I am doing least squares fits, up to cubic with 15 X's. Only the 1st several ever turn out "significant", so those at the "bottom" with small p values could be removed...one at a time...as long as R^2 doesn't go down. This would be a slow iterative process, but would result in a much shorter equation. I know of one other tool that will do this.

Can JMP?

Thanks,
Dave
10 REPLIES 10

Re: Least squares regression - removing insignificant terms quickly?

> I still wonder if the "backwards"
> elimination of insignificant terms actually gives a
> more phsysics based model. If so, I'd prefer that.

Backwards elimination (and other statistical methods) do not result in a "phsysics [sic] based model". These statistical modeling techniques give you an empirical model, and don't even attempt to produce a"phsysics [sic] based model". These statistical modeling techniques give you a model based upon the data, based upon the algorithm you use, and the algorithm parameters that you specify.

Do not think that the model you come up with via statistical methods represents true underlying physical mechanisms — the model may, or may not, represent the underlying physical mechanisms.

Recommended Articles