> I still wonder if the "backwards"
> elimination of insignificant terms actually gives a
> more phsysics based model. If so, I'd prefer that.
Backwards elimination (and other statistical methods) do not result in a "phsysics [sic] based model". These statistical modeling techniques give you an empirical model, and don't even attempt to produce a"phsysics [sic] based model". These statistical modeling techniques give you a model based upon the data, based upon the algorithm you use, and the algorithm parameters that you specify.
Do not think that the model you come up with via statistical methods represents true underlying physical mechanisms — the model may, or may not, represent the underlying physical mechanisms.