Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Is there a way to create a bland-altman analysis and have the mean be based on a...

Topic Options

- Start Article
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Mar 7, 2016 2:06 PM
(3603 views)

So I have two trials of data and I want to analyze how far they are away from 0.667, is there a way to make 0.667 my x-line?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

As conventionally understood, a Bland-Altman analysis is for testing the level of agreement between two different ways of measuring the same thing. See, for example:

http://www.stattutorials.com/SAS/TUTORIAL-BLAND-ALTMAN.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland–Altman_plot

https://community.jmp.com/docs/DOC-6171

So using this approach doesn't seem to stack up with your desire to 'analyze how far each trial is away from 0.667'.

Can you describe a little more how your data was measured, or better yet, supply a sample?

1 REPLY 1

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

As conventionally understood, a Bland-Altman analysis is for testing the level of agreement between two different ways of measuring the same thing. See, for example:

http://www.stattutorials.com/SAS/TUTORIAL-BLAND-ALTMAN.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bland–Altman_plot

https://community.jmp.com/docs/DOC-6171

So using this approach doesn't seem to stack up with your desire to 'analyze how far each trial is away from 0.667'.

Can you describe a little more how your data was measured, or better yet, supply a sample?