cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • See how to use the JMP Marketplace – Free tools to expand JMP capabilities. Register. July 10, 2 pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
jthi
Super User

Is it by design that header summary graphs aren't affected by column properties such as Missing Value Codes and Value Labels?

Is this by design that Column properties don't seem to affect header summary graphs?

 

Here I have set Missing Value Code to "M" and Value Label to F = "Female" and you can see difference between the header summary graphs and distribution plot:

jthi_1-1676371285139.png

 

-Jarmo
4 REPLIES 4
SamGardner
Level VII

Re: Is it by design that header summary graphs aren't affected by column properties such as Missing Value Codes and Value Labels?

@jthi I don't think it is by design.  Can you submit this to JMP Technical Support so that we can investigate this?  Thanks.  

XanGregg
Staff

Re: Is it by design that header summary graphs aren't affected by column properties such as Missing Value Codes and Value Labels?

Sam is right. Notice that missing value codes are honored for the histograms for continuous columns.

jthi
Super User

Re: Is it by design that header summary graphs aren't affected by column properties such as Missing Value Codes and Value Labels?

Message sent to support, TS-00034242.

-Jarmo
hogi
Level XIII

Re: Is it by design that header summary graphs aren't affected by column properties such as Missing Value Codes and Value Labels?

the issue with the value labels got fixed. (Jmp 17.2)

 

concerning Missing Value Code and non-continuous columns - hm,
Distribution seems to be the outlier. Will it be fixed to be consistent with the other plots?

 

hogi_1-1702325786175.png

 

 

 

Recommended Articles