cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • See how to use the JMP Marketplace – Free tools to expand JMP capabilities. Register. July 10, 2 pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Improvement of (Custom) Screening Design to lower number of experiments

Dear JMP community,

I would like to characterize and optimize a biochemical reaction (enzyme assay). Therefore, I'm planning to do a screening first to scan for relevant factors. For now, I've decided to screen 8 factors (2x two-level categorical, 1x three-level categorical, 5x continuous).

I am familiar with the classical two-level screenings, but have never used a custom design before. My problem is my three-level categorical factor. It is the reason I chose a custom design and it seems to increase the necessary experiments a lot. Around 20 experiments for only main effects and over 50 experiments for main effects and two-factor interactions (with power over 0.8 for each factor).

Is there another option to find a compromise? I thought about trying to remove one level of the three-level categorical factor by pretests, only focusing on main effects for now, or dealing with a lower power of the test.

Thank you very much! 

(JMP Version: Student Edition 18)

10 REPLIES 10
statman
Super User

Re: Improvement of (Custom) Screening Design to lower number of experiments

Yes, good suggestion.  This is why the specific situation needs to be understood before experimentation (situation diagnostics). Then it gets back to the compounds...what is really different between them?  Are they chemical compounds?  Then you might consider that you are experimenting of ratios or percentages of certain chemicals.  Which ones do you hypothesize are active?...and so the questions continue.

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

Recommended Articles