Hi @CoverGazelle271,
Welcome in the Community!
The decision to have fixed or random effects is known during design creation and before the analysis, depending on how you consider these factors:
- If this factor may change the response mean and can be changed/repeated in a reproducible way, then it can be considered as a fixed effect.
- If this factor needs to be accounted for the response variance (different variability in the response for different operators, equipments, days, ...), and only represent a subset/sample of possible values from a population, then this factor can be considered as a random effect.
In your case, and given your prediction objective independently of the day, I would consider this factor as random.
You would then use a mixed model for the analysis.
Note that you can visualize the results before analyzing, and since the experiments will be distributed "homogeneously" between the two days (random blocks), you can check visually that you don't have any significant difference in response mean and variance/variability between the two days. A simple visualization with day as X, response as Y, allow you to check if response mean seems very different between the two days as well as the variability (using box plots and statistics summaries for example).
Hope this answer will help you,
Victor GUILLER
"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)