cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
The Discovery Summit 2025 Call for Content is open! Submit an abstract today to present at our premier analytics conference.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
DualARIMACougar
Level III

How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Dear JMP expert,

 

I set up two RSM designs, one with 3 factors (two continuous and one discrete numerical with four levels) and one with 4 factors (same as first plan but one more factor) using the custom designer (See Excel sheet with blinded factors). 

 

Now I have to explain my colleges in easy words, why I have odd factor settings (see red marked in excel sheet), which is difficult for me since I am not a hardcore mathematican and I just trust the JMP algorithm for custom design.

Thanks a lot for your help!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Victor_G
Super User

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Hi @DualARIMACougar,

 

The "strange" values obtained by the Custom Design platform are the results of the convergence of the coordinate-exchange algorithm used to compute optimal design.
See the response here : https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Random-decimals-incorporated-in-mixture-screening-design/m-...

You can still change these values and round up to the closest value (like 45 instead of 46,85 in your first design example), you may lose a little bit of optimality, but you can compare the initial design values with the new "corrected" values with the Compare Designs Platform to assess the influence of this/these change(s).

 

Hope this will help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Victor_G
Super User

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Hi @DualARIMACougar,

 

The "strange" values obtained by the Custom Design platform are the results of the convergence of the coordinate-exchange algorithm used to compute optimal design.
See the response here : https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Random-decimals-incorporated-in-mixture-screening-design/m-...

You can still change these values and round up to the closest value (like 45 instead of 46,85 in your first design example), you may lose a little bit of optimality, but you can compare the initial design values with the new "corrected" values with the Compare Designs Platform to assess the influence of this/these change(s).

 

Hope this will help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)
DualARIMACougar
Level III

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Thanks a lot Victor! This helps!