cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Check out the JMP® Marketplace featured Capability Explorer add-in
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Dear JMP expert,

 

I set up two RSM designs, one with 3 factors (two continuous and one discrete numerical with four levels) and one with 4 factors (same as first plan but one more factor) using the custom designer (See Excel sheet with blinded factors). 

 

Now I have to explain my colleges in easy words, why I have odd factor settings (see red marked in excel sheet), which is difficult for me since I am not a hardcore mathematican and I just trust the JMP algorithm for custom design.

Thanks a lot for your help!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Victor_G
Super User

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Hi @DualARIMACougar,

 

The "strange" values obtained by the Custom Design platform are the results of the convergence of the coordinate-exchange algorithm used to compute optimal design.
See the response here : https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Random-decimals-incorporated-in-mixture-screening-design/m-...

You can still change these values and round up to the closest value (like 45 instead of 46,85 in your first design example), you may lose a little bit of optimality, but you can compare the initial design values with the new "corrected" values with the Compare Designs Platform to assess the influence of this/these change(s).

 

Hope this will help you,

Victor GUILLER
L'Oréal Data & Analytics

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Victor_G
Super User

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Hi @DualARIMACougar,

 

The "strange" values obtained by the Custom Design platform are the results of the convergence of the coordinate-exchange algorithm used to compute optimal design.
See the response here : https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Random-decimals-incorporated-in-mixture-screening-design/m-...

You can still change these values and round up to the closest value (like 45 instead of 46,85 in your first design example), you may lose a little bit of optimality, but you can compare the initial design values with the new "corrected" values with the Compare Designs Platform to assess the influence of this/these change(s).

 

Hope this will help you,

Victor GUILLER
L'Oréal Data & Analytics

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

Re: How are odd factor settings in D-optimal RSM generated

Thanks a lot Victor! This helps!