Many distribution models have a hypothesis test for goodness of fit. The hypothesis test is based on the null hypothesis (that is, the one that is assumed to be true) that the observed data sample is in fact from a population with such a distribution. The alternative is that the population does not have such a distribution. One or more statistics have been developed for some distributions to represent the null hypothesis. The sampling distribution of these statistics is used to compute a p-value. Some statistics cover the p-value better than others. Not all distributions have a statistic, though. Also, a mixture model for a distribution does not have a statistic to test the null hypothesis.
(When such a test is available, I would caution you against always using alpha = 0.05 for every decision about significance.)
In your case, I suggest that you use an information criterion instead of a sample statistic. AICc or BIC may be used for this purpose. The best model based on the criterion alone is the one with the minimum criterion value. This is not a test, though. There is no p-value. There is no such decision as 'significant' or 'not significant.' There is only selection of one model over the other candidate models.